🚀 go-pugleaf

Nomad in Starkhafn <nomadSPAMMENOTsca@aol.com> wrote in message > The thing
is, if the officers had all been honest they probably would
> have gotten a conviction it sounds like. Instead they attempted to
> embellish it so they could try to get the guy the harshest punishment
> they could. And of course, if you get caught in one lie or
> contradictory statement it tends to make ALL your statements suspect.
> Those officers that lied and/or embellished their statements are more
> responsible for that not guilty verdict than anyone else. How does it
> feel to know that you guys are responsible for that guy going free?
>
>
> Nomad/Michael
> Las Vegas, NV
> Barony of Starkhafn, Kingdom of Caid

------------

IMO, your explanation is right on the button. And if I might add, this is
almost like the OJ Simpson trial. Mark Furhman, in his biased attempt to
ADD to the evidence, jeopardized the whole trail. Whereas, if they had just
told the truth, instead of embellishing it, IMO, both these people, who IMO,
were guilty, would have been found guilty.

On the other hand, the two-bit-racists don't want to hear your explanation.
They
are not going to say the police lied, of if they do, they CONDONE police
lying.

Again, good post and points well stated.

Coleman(the real one)(check the header)