🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: misc.emerg-services
Article #2468

Re: Off topic? Planes (My quiet street)

#2468
From: Carey Gregory
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 01:01
25 lines
3051 bytes
Andrew Gideon <ag7337@gideon.org> wrote:

>But the reality is the government is grandstanding while putting our
>children at risk.  

You'll get no argument from me that most of the post-9/11 security measures
are useless wastes of time and money.  (But, really, there's no need to
throw in the children thing for emotional effect.  We're all at risk.)

However, I do think flight restrictions over sensitive targets aren't
unreasonable.  It makes sense to defend against the threats you can within
reasonable cost and disruption.  Biological and nuke attacks are difficult,
complex and expensive, so worrying about those from aircraft probably isn't
worth the effort.  Like you said, it would be easier and more effective to
deliver it from land.

But explosives are cheap and it does make sense to deliver them from the air
since getting close to the White House (or wherever) with a box truck is
likely to prove very difficult.  It would be much easier to do it from the
air (if airspace there was unrestricted).  I've already provided the
calculations showing you could put enough explosives in a Cessna to do
serious damage, so it's not an unreasonable concern.

Restricted airspaces have always existed in aviation.  I fail to see why
it's so unreasonable now.  
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9p0q911ob84912tg3lpod04l3rpf2mlkhc@4ax.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <4293F8BB.2AB4F203@ix.netcom.com> <1198doojrfouo8c@corp.supernews.com> <42954071.D91806AB@ix.netcom.com> <119asc19gdvchd9@corp.supernews.com> <abpe91tqkt4qfhs7hecthgfd89g52bur5c@4ax.com> <Xns966390630C992dmalcolmhiwaaynet@216.168.3.44> <ds7p91tkf2595kblpsadvavi4o3po5r124@4ax.com> <2980849.ZqNb5Svj8f@no.to.be.used.news.int.tagonline.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 101376,83f33c9c11aab6
X-Google-Thread: f8929,83f33c9c11aab6
X-Google-Thread: 101049,83f33c9c11aab6
X-Google-Thread: 108b95,83f33c9c11aab6
X-Google-Attributes: gid101376,gidf8929,gid101049,gid108b95,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:01:19 -0500
From: Carey Gregory <tiredofspam123@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: misc.emerg-services,rec.aviation.student,dc.general,md.general
Subject: Re: Off topic? Planes (My quiet street)
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 21:01:20 -0400
Organization: GTC
Message-ID: <9p0q911ob84912tg3lpod04l3rpf2mlkhc@4ax.com>
References: <4293F8BB.2AB4F203@ix.netcom.com> <1198doojrfouo8c@corp.supernews.com> <42954071.D91806AB@ix.netcom.com> <119asc19gdvchd9@corp.supernews.com> <abpe91tqkt4qfhs7hecthgfd89g52bur5c@4ax.com> <Xns966390630C992dmalcolmhiwaaynet@216.168.3.44> <ds7p91tkf2595kblpsadvavi4o3po5r124@4ax.com> <2980849.ZqNb5Svj8f@no.to.be.used.news.int.tagonline.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 26
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.165.6.252
X-Trace: sv3-qDsbnff3NzjscoUH+di5lL+jF+Kc/YHn43vEq6NotrU2bOE4gbu0IETQZYqTyxMnP95LU2M8X7hy+RB!CHnpAY9bf2nRepWG2Bk+MstyRz3nInRFq9AI1VQn4p2xMuyL4TVa8uctRj1Y2PVCYB2aNuY=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32