🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

4 total messages Started by keith.r.smith Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:51
amazing deadlift
#2756
Author: keith.r.smith
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:51
20 lines
1700 bytes
I have had occasion to train with a variety of poeple in my time, but this
one in particular, still amazes me to this day. For the life of me right
now, I cannot think of her name.... only that she was a girlfriend of my
SO of the time. She stood about 5'2" (probably more like 5'0"), and she
weighed about 130 lbs. She did not really look fat, nor especially muscular.
If anything, she looked just-a-little pudgy, and younger than her 22 years.
I became acquainted with her through my SO, and she found out that I was into
weight training. She expressed an interest in training with me, and we did so
for a few sessions, until my SO became more-than-a-little vocal with her
objections (y'see, she was a jealous type). Anyway, we spent the better part
of this time just trying to determine how strong she was. We did this by way
of deadlift poundages. After about three weeks of "ramping up", this little
baby-doll-lookin' young woman was pulling 300 lbs. in the deadlift. I still
do not know just how strong she was, as 300 lbs. was all of the iron that I
had at that time. Bear in mind that we are talking about a young woman who
was basically untrained (as far as weight-training) at this point. I can
hardly imagine what she might be able to do with a coupla' years worth of
hard training under her belt.

Keith R
Re: amazing deadlift
#2767
Author: gilbert.m.stewart
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 23:20
17 lines
1379 bytes
In article <1993Jan25.185141.18912@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> krw@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (keith.r.smith) writes:
[....]
>of deadlift poundages. After about three weeks of "ramping up", this little
>baby-doll-lookin' young woman was pulling 300 lbs. in the deadlift. I still
>do not know just how strong she was, as 300 lbs. was all of the iron that I
>had at that time. Bear in mind that we are talking about a young woman who
>was basically untrained (as far as weight-training) at this point. I can
>hardly imagine what she might be able to do with a coupla' years worth of
>hard training under her belt.
>
Probably quite a bit.  But it's probably determined not so much by her
strength, but the actual distance she had to lift the weight, and the
fact that at 5'2", she probably didn't have to bend her back nearly as
much as you.  A more accurate measure of her strength would probably
be found in other movements.

GMS
Re: amazing deadlift
#2799
Author: keith.r.smith
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:13
26 lines
1861 bytes
In article <1993Jan25.232050.3541@cbnewse.cb.att.com> gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart) writes:
>In article <1993Jan25.185141.18912@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> krw@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (keith.r.smith) writes:
>[....]
>>of deadlift poundages. After about three weeks of "ramping up", this little
>>baby-doll-lookin' young woman was pulling 300 lbs. in the deadlift. I still
>>do not know just how strong she was, as 300 lbs. was all of the iron that I
>>had at that time. Bear in mind that we are talking about a young woman who
>>was basically untrained (as far as weight-training) at this point. I can
>>hardly imagine what she might be able to do with a coupla' years worth of
>>hard training under her belt.
>>
>Probably quite a bit.  But it's probably determined not so much by her
>strength, but the actual distance she had to lift the weight, and the
>fact that at 5'2", she probably didn't have to bend her back nearly as
>much as you.  A more accurate measure of her strength would probably
>be found in other movements.
>
>GMS

I had thought about that. There are certain advantages to being built
"low to the ground". On the other hand, her stature would not make it
any easier for her to grip the bar. Twice bodyweight+ is still twice
bodyweight+ as far as the grip strength is concerned. As far as finding
out what she was capable of in other lifts, well, we never got the chance.

Keith R
Re: amazing deadlift
#2812
Author: Aleck H Alexopoulos
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:23
23 lines
1717 bytes
In article <1993Jan25.185141.18912@cbnewsk.cb.att.com>, krw@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (keith.r.smith) writes:
|> I have had occasion to train with a variety of poeple in my time, but this
|> one in particular, still amazes me to this day. For the life of me right
|> now, I cannot think of her name.... only that she was a girlfriend of my
|> SO of the time. She stood about 5'2" (probably more like 5'0"), and she

The key here is the 5'2" height of hers. The deadlift is one exercise where 
being short helps. The difference between a short guy and a tall one is the 
starting position. The short guy might have his thighs above parallel while the 
tall guy will have his thighs below parallel. That makes a big difference 
in power. One example that comes to mind is     Franco Columbo    with 
that - frequently published - photo of him deadlifting 740lbs with ease. 

|> .............. After about three weeks of "ramping up", this little
|> baby-doll-lookin' young woman was pulling 300 lbs. in the deadlift. I still
|> do not know just how strong she was, as 300 lbs. was all of the iron that I
|> had at that time.........

|> 
|> Keith R


Aleck
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads