🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 21 Dec 1998 22:20:30, "Scott M. Kertes" <hartford@webspan.net>
wrote:

> Very intellegent response. When I wonder if the government, who is supposed
> to be run for the people and by the people, is really being run for the
> people and by the people, I get my answer every time when I see a response
> like "shut up". People like you need to be told how things will be, and not
> given a chance to be a part of the political process, because your lack of
> brain power would prevent you from making sense out of anything. Now you
> shut up.
> 
> 
> Jamon Silva wrote in message ...
> >Shuttup

Mr Silva's response may not have been very eloquent but it was at 
least succinct.

Although I have no doubt you are sincere in your criticism, there are 
two things which you overlook in your followup:

1.  The newsgroups to which the original message was posted are all 
"for sale" groups and are inappropriate fora for political opinions.

2.  Not everyone who reads these newsgroups lives in the USA.  To many
people the shenanigans of the US Government are simply irrelevant.

3.  The fact that the President is to be impeached does not mean that 
the presidency is under threat.  Some would argue that the impeachment
is essential for the preservation of the presidency.  This is a valid 
point of view.  In any case, the verdict is by no means a foregone 
conclusion.

4.  I can't count.

This debate should now terminate.  It should never have been here in 
the first place.  I promise to say no more here.