🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1991Jan29.094317.11153@forwiss.uni-passau.de> sluka@stoch.fmi.uni-passau.de (Bernd Sluka) writes:
>In article <1991Jan28.164745.18240@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
>  crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) writes:
>
>>     Coalition forces are involved in an anti-war effort.  Fortunately,
>>     some can see that sometimes in order to defend the peace, you must
>>     wage war.
>
>No. In beginning a war you are negating peace, not defending it.
Right! but He didn't say nor mean beginning, he said wage war.
Saddam Hussein began the War, we were just a bit late in beginning our defence.
We must wage (carry the stress of) war in order defend/return to peace.

You might answer: Stop defending and leave....

... SH in possesion of Kuwait and after possible (likely) future attacks
perhaps a piece of here and a piece of there.

Peace includes Freedom. How peaceful it would be, give him this give him
that and keep "peace (by definition of Bernd Sluka)"
>
>>     I sincerely hope that this is not a majority opinion in the Federal
>>     Republic.  Otherwise, I would suggest ...
>
>I don't know. It looks like a minority opinion in our gouvernement and
>parliament. But the opposition is on my side.
Yes luckily it is a minority opinion. As long as it is the minority is
safe (it's being protected against it's own will by the majority)
but when it becomes a majority ?
Fine if it's like that in every country (meaning no attacks), but very
utopic.
-- 
Andrew Wheadon | andrew@acwbust.incom.de | I support the troops in the Golf