🚀 go-pugleaf

cscbe@uhura.neoucom.EDU (Computer Services Staff) writes:

>In article <1477@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de> p515dfi@mpirbn.UUCP (Daniel Fischer) writes:

[Daniel Fischers well written article deleted for brevity]

>It's wonderful that the people of Germany and Europe made their opinions known,
>and that you are able to.

Are we? Does the average American TV viewer know our opinions? How is the
coverage of these opinions in the American media?

>     However, the war IS going on, and will only stop
>when Saddam is driven out of Kuwait.

By using passive voice you try to hide the fact that those who started
this war can stop it. Please don't try to mask a decision as a fact.

>  This man is a ruthless dictator, who
>killed his way into power, is attacking, unprevoked, innocent countries,
>and using enviromental terrorism to try to raise opposition to the war.

Sure he is. There are others like him. Some get your support (your 
governments support, to be precise), some don't. 

>Saddam Hussein started with Iraq, followed by Kuwait, and then again tried
>to start into Saudi Arabia.  With these precedents, what would stop him from
>taking over the ENTIRE region, and then moving into YOUR Europe. 

According to your TV, he started with his family, and of course, after
aquiring Europe, he will surely try to ursurp the United States. 

This is paranoia.

> Shall we
>pull out of the war, and sit back and wait???  I don't think that is a 
>very viable option.  He started the war, we came into the war after all
>reasonable attempts at sanctions failed, and we will END this war.

This war should not have been started at all. This was indeed a viable
option, because sanctions started to begin to work. Before that, there
have been other options, which have been missed. 

>Enough Said!

Enough killed. Stop the war, PLEASE.

Wolfgang Strobl