Article View: misc.headlines
Article #138Re: RUSH LIMBAUGH'S SECRET NON-AGENDA
From: Rob Dobson
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 16:35
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 16:35
62 lines
3248 bytes
3248 bytes
In article <BrqwCC.2qp@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tbuckley@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Tim Buckley) writes: > >>>>Larry King (also a talk-show host) as well as a number of other talk >>>>show hosts have publicly questioned Rush Limbaugh's feelings towards >>>>blacks, women and all minorities. >> >>>>He is not much more than a hate monger hiding behind a smoke-screen >>>>which he calls patriotism. This is not unusual (historically). >>> >>>I publicly question your ability to back this statement up with some >>>facts. >> >>Well, i have never heard Rush on the subject of race. The only time I was >>unfortunate enough to hear his program, though, he spoke on censorship. His >>rant was basically to the effect of "its illegal to pray at a graduation, >>I mean prayer is illegal, but its ok to sing songs about killing cops." He >>continued this rant for several minutes before I got bored and changed the >>station. >> >>Nice logic, Rush. Of course prayer is not illegal, it just cant be government >>funded. Im sure that few jurisdictions would allow "Cop Killer" to be sung >>at their graduation ceremonies either. Such ridiculous, inflammatory non- >>logic places rush one level below Paul Harvey in my book. >> >> > >Look I hate to be mean here but your post said that Rush was "nothing >more than a hate monger". You were then asked to provide evidence to >this point. IT WAS NOT MY POST. I WAS RESPONDING TO A THREAD THAT WAS DAYS OLD ALREADY. I MADE NO CLAIM TO PROVE THAT HE WAS A HATE MONGER. I NEVER SAID HE WAS A HATE MONGER. PLEASE LOOK MORE CLOSELY BEFORE CRTICIZING ME FOR PAGES ON END. thank you >> >You on the other hand never even attempted to provide the evidence that >was needed to support your claim that Rush is a hate monger. It was not my claim, asshole.In fact, I began my post by saying "I have never heard Rush on the subject of race". DO YOU KNOW HOW TO READ?? >effect then do not make such obviously pitiful attempts to persuade us >with inconsequential "facts". Take your vitriolic and illogical >argument to alt.stupidity or alt.pathetic. No, you take your crap to alt.pathetic asshole. Read who said what. I even admitted that my story was taking this thread in a different direction. >You owe Rush and apology and >the readers of this newsgroup an apology for wasting our time refuting >your silly statements. No, ASSWIPE, you owe ME an apology. You did not read my post properly, and then preceeded to blast me for it for pages on end. > >Have a nice day > >Tim -rob
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul21.163510.1709@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!poe.acc.Virginia.EDU!rwd4fReferences:
<1992Jul21.000223.5231@henson.cc.wwu.edu> <1992Jul21.133052.28529@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <BrqwCC.2qp@news.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.headlines,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideast,soc.culture.arabic,alt.conspiracy,alt.censorship,soc.rights.human,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!poe.acc.Virginia.EDU!rwd4f From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) Subject: Re: RUSH LIMBAUGH'S SECRET NON-AGENDA Message-ID: <1992Jul21.163510.1709@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: University of Virginia References: <1992Jul21.000223.5231@henson.cc.wwu.edu> <1992Jul21.133052.28529@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <BrqwCC.2qp@news.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 16:35:10 GMT Lines: 62