🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug6.165015.24455@ddsw1.mcs.com> arf@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Jack Schmidling) writes:
> Judging by the lame excuses for Pollard that still persist this morning, I 
> can only assume that this article did not get posted......

No, Arf, it did get posted, just ignored.  Would you like me to set up
a kill file that will mail you a copy of each article you post, so you
know its gotten out?

We all saw it, just ignored it, as its just another rehash of the old
"double loyalties" canard.  


Specific examples include:


> officials, concludes, "This remarkable intelligence harvest is provided
> largely, not by paid agents, but by an unofficial network of sympathetic
> American officials who work in the Pentagon, State Department, congressional
> offices, the National Security Council, and even the U.S intelligence
> agencies."

Clearly, these "symapthetic officials are all Jews confused about who
they pledged alleigence to.

>       The FBI "knew of at least a dozen incidents in which American officials
> transferred classified information to the Israelis," according to Raymond W.
> Wannal,Jr, a former assistant director of the FBI. None was prosecuted. The
> files gather dust.

I know of at least 100 such incedents.  They are provided for by
Intelegence sharing agreements.  Nice twisting of his words.

> 
>      The imprisonment of the Pollards, U.S. officials believe, has not ended
> Israeli espionage in the United States. Most of the secret information, as in
> the past, is furnished by U.S citizens without compensation.

Yet more unattributed double-loyalty accusations.  Yawn.

We all saw your Barf, arf. Now leave talk.politics.mideast like you
promised.





Adam Shostack 					adam@das.harvard.edu

What a terrible thing to have lost one's .sig.  Or not to have a .sig
at all.  How true that is.