Article View: misc.headlines
Article #190Re: Schmidling is simply wrong.
From: Jim Eggert x6127 g41
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1992 00:29
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1992 00:29
22 lines
1995 bytes
1995 bytes
In article <1992Aug5.211736.12790@bony1.bony.com> jake@bony1.bony.com (Jake Livni) writes: > In article <EGGERTJ.92Aug3235230@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu> eggertj@atc.ll.mit.edu writes:> > > >I seem to have touched a nerve here. It is not a lie that the Pollard > >case _by itself_ constitutes significant Israeli spying in the US. > >And how can you claim (which you did implicitly by calling me a liar) > >that there is and has been no other Israeli spying in the US? That > >assumption seems pretty naive. > > Firstly, Pollard only gave the Israelis information that the US had > already agreed to share with Israel in an agreement that Reagan/Weinberger > reneged on. This, by itself, does not constitute significant nor > extensive spying. Where in the world do you get this idea? Please quote the agreement that bound the US to send the Israelis all of the secret documents that Pollard had sent. If you can't, then this is just another one of your attempts by truth by blatant assertion. Silly propaganda, actually. > [rest of posting deleted due to low signal-to-noise ratio] -- =Jim eggertj@atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<EGGERTJ.92Aug7002943@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!xn.ll.mit.edu!xn.ll.mit.edu!eggertjReferences:
<EGGERTJ.92Aug3182009@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu> <1992Aug4.000830.17644@fid.morgan.com> <EGGERTJ.92Aug3235230@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu> <1992Aug5.211736.12790@bony1.bony.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.headlines,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideast,soc.culture.arabic,alt.conspiracy,alt.censorship,soc.rights.human,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!xn.ll.mit.edu!xn.ll.mit.edu!eggertj From: eggertj@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert x6127 g41) Subject: Re: Schmidling is simply wrong. In-Reply-To: jake@bony1.bony.com's message of Wed, 5 Aug 92 21:17:36 GMT Message-ID: <EGGERTJ.92Aug7002943@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu> Sender: usenet@xn.ll.mit.edu Reply-To: eggertj@atc.ll.mit.edu Organization: MIT Lincoln Lab - Group 41 References: <EGGERTJ.92Aug3182009@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu> <1992Aug4.000830.17644@fid.morgan.com> <EGGERTJ.92Aug3235230@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu> <1992Aug5.211736.12790@bony1.bony.com> Date: 7 Aug 92 00:29:43 Lines: 22