🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <EGGERTJ.92Aug7002943@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu> eggertj@atc.ll.mit.edu writes:
>In article <1992Aug5.211736.12790@bony1.bony.com> jake@bony1.bony.com (Jake Livni) writes:
>>   In article <EGGERTJ.92Aug3235230@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu> eggertj@atc.ll.mit.edu writes:>
>>
>>   >I seem to have touched a nerve here.  It is not a lie that the Pollard
>>   >case _by itself_ constitutes significant Israeli spying in the US.
>>   >And how can you claim (which you did implicitly by calling me a liar)
>>   >that there is and has been no other Israeli spying in the US?  That
>>   >assumption seems pretty naive.
>>
>>   Firstly, Pollard only gave the Israelis information that the US had
>>   already agreed to share with Israel in an agreement that Reagan/Weinberger 
>>   reneged on.  This, by itself, does not constitute significant nor 
>>   extensive spying.
>
>Where in the world do you get this idea?  Please quote the agreement
>that bound the US to send the Israelis all of the secret documents
>that Pollard had sent.  If you can't, then this is just another one of
>your attempts by truth by blatant assertion.  Silly propaganda, actually.

	Obviously, Jake can't quote the document of it is secret. Given
the facts we know about US-Israeli intelligence cooperation, Jake's
argument is not all that far fetched. The problem is that the Israelis
cheated on the system, rather than going through appropriate channels.
Jay Pollard's job was not to control the flow of intelligence info
going to the Israeli side. He was deluded to think that he was acting
in a manner that helped Israeli interests without hurting US interests.

	Bill R.

	"My opinions do not represent those of my employer or any
government agency."

-- 
Bill R.