🚀 go-pugleaf

nelson_p@apollo.hp.com  writes:

> In article <BstxFE.C88@apollo.hp.com> goykhman_a@apollo.hp.com (Alex Goykhman) writes:
> >In article <1992Aug11.145521.29060@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca> bunker@physun.physics.mcmaster.ca (Alex Bunker) writes:
> >...
> >>World govenrment is closer at hand now than in the 60's and yes I will
> >>not hide it Frank can speak for himself but I will stand proud and say
> >>I AM IN FAVOR OF WORLD GOVERNMENT AND I REFUSE TO FEEL ANY ALLEGENCE TO
> >>ANY SUBUNIT OF THE WHOLE COMMONLY KNOWN AS A COUNTRY!!!!
> >
> >    Do you realize that if the New World Order takes hold,
> >    there will be no place to hide?
> 
>    This is correct.   The single biggest problem with one world
>    government is that if you don't happen to agree with it or
>    like it you're still stuck with it.  Note that this is a 
>    problem even if it's not some sort of totalitarian police
>    state.   And what if is IS some sort of totalitarian police
>    state?

Proof, I beg you-- PROOF!  I say that if you don't agree with the one
     world government, then change it.  You're allowed to do that
     in the U.S.; why not with a body that governs the world?

The biggest (not the only) problem I see in implementing a body
     that would serve the world happens to be religion.  Beyond
     that (and some other problems, such as language), I see no
     evil in placing a government that would serve the needs of
     our Earth.


> 
>    
> ---peter
> 

Stephen @Trajan