Article View: misc.headlines
Article #389Re: Want facts? "WHO RUNS THE MEDIA? The Alarming Facts"
From: Jim Eggert x6127 g41
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 02:57
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 02:57
58 lines
3484 bytes
3484 bytes
In article <dfs.702929532@ro> dfs@doe.carleton.ca (David F. Skoll) writes: > In <JIME.92Apr10103806@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu> > jime@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert x6127 g41) writes: > > >Israel did _not_ acquire its land in the same way that that America > >acquired its land. > Wrong. > ... > Make no mistake, the U.S. gained its land by a war of conquest prosecuted > by Europeans against North American Indians. And the Europeans started the > war. And the U.S. is to blame for European colonialism? I think you have the cart before the horse there. > >And in my admittedly insufficient reading, Jerusalem was free for > >worship to all faiths under British rule. > As it is today. As it was NOT between 1948 and 1967. The claim I was responding to was that Jerusalem has only been free for religious worship under Israeli administration. That claim was false. > >In fact, one of the early > >Arab-Jew riots in the Palestinian Mandate started because the Jews, > >who had been allowed to worship at the Wailing Wall (then owned by the > >Arabs) wanted to set up a partition there. > > I didn't know that the Arabs "owned" the Western (preferred term) > Wall. But anyway... Well, you learned something. I try to learn things every day. The Wailing Wall name is much more poetic, so it is the preferred term. Western Wall is ambiguous, as it refers also to German defences in WWII. If you prefer the Arabic term, it is al-Buraq al-Sharif. > This "partition" was to have been a partition to separate men from > women, and was certainly not a building. (Witness the partition there > today - basically a small fence.) This partition was used as an > excuse by Arab leaders to incite violence against Jews. I suggest you > read the book "Israel: Roots and Routes" published by Steimatzky > publishing house for some more history of that event. Perhaps you should also mention the fact that the British authorities nixed the partition idea. On August 15, 1929, Zionists marched, raised their flag, and sang the Hatikvah, in violation of their demonstration permit. They shouted "the Wall is ours" (or the equivalent in other languages). On August 23, 1929, the Arabs, incensed by the Jews' threats against their property, began to loot the Jewish quarter, and attacked Jews who got in the way. The Jews responded with hand grenades, killing Arabs. The Jewish demonstrations which brought on the violence were the brainchild of Vladimir Jabotinsky, who had done much the same thing in 1920 and had served in jail for those crimes. -- =Jim jime%atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<JIME.92Apr10225734@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!mips!swrinde!gatech!rutgers!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!xn.ll.mit.edu!xn.ll.mit.edu!jimeReferences:
<1992Apr10.015851.5558@augean.eleceng.adelaide.edu.AU> <1992Apr10.082142.7808@muddcs.claremont.edu> <JIME.92Apr10103806@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu> <dfs.702929532@ro>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!mips!swrinde!gatech!rutgers!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!xn.ll.mit.edu!xn.ll.mit.edu!jime From: jime@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert x6127 g41) Newsgroups: misc.headlines,soc.misc,talk.politics.mideast,talk.politics.misc,alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Want facts? "WHO RUNS THE MEDIA? The Alarming Facts" Message-ID: <JIME.92Apr10225734@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu> Date: 11 Apr 92 02:57:34 GMT References: <1992Apr10.015851.5558@augean.eleceng.adelaide.edu.AU> <1992Apr10.082142.7808@muddcs.claremont.edu> <JIME.92Apr10103806@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu> <dfs.702929532@ro> Sender: usenet@xn.ll.mit.edu Organization: MIT Lincoln Lab - Group 41 Lines: 58 In-Reply-To: dfs@doe.carleton.ca's message of Fri, 10 Apr 1992 18:12:12 GMT