Article View: misc.headlines
Article #399Re: Charting the murkey depths of Bill Clinton
From: Gary Hypes
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 21:22
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 21:22
46 lines
2733 bytes
2733 bytes
***************************** matjmm@gsusgi1.gsu.edu (John Morgan Morris) writes: Can anyone else compile a better list? I'm just sick of seeing one candidate getting bashed because he's new to the scene, and another getting away with everything just because he's been around a while... **************************** John, Willie-bashing is so much fun because it's so EASY! Honest, I like Bill Clinton; I think that he's a nice guy, bright, and overall a good and progressive governor for the state of Alabama. But this parade of scandals is HILARIOUS! Any day now, I expect to see an illegitimate son pop out of the woodwork, or maybe revelations that his mother heads up a coven of witches somewhere in the back woods. Or maybe that the joint he didn't inhale was smoked in the house Jerry Brown didn't own while he wasn't there. It's like probing your best friend about the blind date he's hooked you up with. First you find out that she really is blind in one eye, the result of a violent dorm fight in the state women's prison. Where she was incarcerated for murdering her fourth husband. For giving her incurable herpes. I mean, after a while the news gets so bad that it's funny. (And all the while, your friend is pleading, "Ignore all that stuff! She's really a neat lady!...") What small fairness I think should be extended to Willie is that the media scrutiny is unnecessarily harsh and demeaning. No newspaper reporter (Doonesbury notwithstanding) is going to get a raise and a promotion for writing a story that begins with "FLASH! Bill Clinton is an honest, decent man who has demonstrated sound political administration skills." The press has lost all moral integrity in this respect, and I think it's sad. A better case can be made for what's happened to Jerry Brown with the latest marijuana charges (not that I care for Jerry, either). This appears - right now, anyway - to be a story with little or no merit whatsoever, and I think it's patently unfair for the press to have pushed this "news" with as little substantiation as it has. The net result is that these guys wind up spending the bulk of their time and energy putting down scandal rumors. No wonder we know as little as we do about the candidates stands on significant political issues. - Gary Hypes -
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<15830009@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!hpscdc!hplextra!hpcc05!hpdmd48!hypesReferences:
<9204091523.AA07983@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: hypes@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com (Gary Hypes) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 21:22:21 GMT Subject: Re: Charting the murkey depths of Bill Clinton Message-ID: <15830009@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com> Organization: Hewlett Packard - Boise, ID Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!hpscdc!hplextra!hpcc05!hpdmd48!hypes Newsgroups: misc.headlines References: <9204091523.AA07983@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Lines: 46