🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Apr12.071510.2846@ennews.eas.asu.edu> makowsky@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (David Makowsky) writes:
>   In article <JIME.92Apr12012428@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu> jime@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert x6127 g41) writes:
>   # >	   What the world community considered [occupied Sinai] was irelevent.  How would
>   # >   you like it if the world community refused to recognize your property
>   # >   rights to your own home?  
>
>   # And here we see the image of arrogance.  World opinion be damned,
>
>	   Great way to respond.  You did not even address my point.

Read on, my friend.

>   # Israel took the Sinai from Egypt, and that's it.  Luckily Begin was
>   # more flexible than you appear to be.
>
>	   Which was one of his few mistakes.
>
>   # Answer me this:  How many Jews
>  # lived in the Sinai in 1966?  Then tell me that it was the home of Israel.

^^^^Here is where I addressed your point.

>   This is irelevent.  Israel payed for the Sinai with its blood in
>   defensive struggles.  And then gave it back.  This has happened more then
>   once, by the way.

This is not at all irrelevant.  You claimed that the Sinai was the
home of Israel.

>   # >   # >  ... the overwhelming majority
>   # >   # >   of the terrorism was (as it still is) commited by the Arabs against
>   # >   # >   the Jews.

>   # >   # Substantiate, please.
>
>   # >	   World events.
>
>   # Great quote.  I'll have to remember that catch-all reference when I
>   # write my next term paper.  See footnote 3.
>   # -----
>   # 3.  World events.
>
>	   Your the one that claims to have read a lot and to be well
>   informed.  For you, this should be sufficient.

I apologize for my severe sarcasm.  It was uncalled for.  I guess I
just didn't think that "World events" was much of a response to a
request for substantiation.
--
=Jim  jime%atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert)