🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Apr13.054206.5584@ennews.eas.asu.edu> makowsky@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (David Makowsky) writes:
>   In article <JIME.92Apr13001541@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu> jime@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert x6127 g41) writes:
>   # An interesting opinion.  In 1989 Israeli IDF Chief of Staff Shomron
>   # said "People ask why we don't end the intifada.  Anyone who wants to
>   # end the intifada must remember that there are only three ways to
>   # achieve this:  transfer of the Arab population of the areas,
>   # starvation, or physical elimination - that is genocide."
>
>	   So you agree with everything Shomron says?

I doubt it.

>   # Which of
>   # these or any other less wimpy policies would you support?
>
>	   The policy I support is transfer.  Without it there will be a
>   massive civil war that will make the intifada look like a sunday
>   school picnic (I know that transfer will lead to some violence, but
>   this violence will also look like a sunday school picnic when compared
>   with what will happen without transfer).  However, this is a long term
>   solution.  In the short term I support whatever policy will end the
>   intifada with the least amount of violence.  This may or may not
>   include one of Shomron's solutions.

Transfer to where?  You support the uprooting of a people from their
homes, and deportation to a land foreign to them?  When that happens
to the Jews, it is usually decried.  When it happens to the Arabs, you
support it.  Why?  It is against the Geneva Convention, anyway.




--
=Jim  jime%atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert)