🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <JIME.92Apr13012048@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu> jime@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert x6127 g41) writes:

# In article <1992Apr12.071510.2846@ennews.eas.asu.edu> makowsky@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (David Makowsky) writes:

# >   In article <JIME.92Apr12012428@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu> jime@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert x6127 g41) writes:

# >   # >	   What the world community considered [occupied Sinai] was irelevent.  How would
# >   # >   you like it if the world community refused to recognize your property
# >   # >   rights to your own home?  

# >   # And here we see the image of arrogance.  World opinion be damned,

# >	   Great way to respond.  You did not even address my point.
 
# Read on, my friend.
 
	I did.  See my response.

# >   # Israel took the Sinai from Egypt, and that's it.  Luckily Begin was
# >   # more flexible than you appear to be.

# >	   Which was one of his few mistakes.

# >   # Answer me this:  How many Jews
# >  # lived in the Sinai in 1966?  Then tell me that it was the home of Israel.

# ^^^^Here is where I addressed your point.

	Excuse me for missing it.  Your analogy was so flawed it never
occured to me.  As it is, I am sure there was a date prior to which
you did not live in your home.  As it was, Israel did have possesion
of the Sinai before 1967, but they returned it to Egypt (which history
showed to be an error).  It is also possible to own something without
living on it.

# >   This is irelevent.  Israel payed for the Sinai with its blood in
# >   defensive struggles.  And then gave it back.  This has happened more then
# >   once, by the way.
 
# This is not at all irrelevant.  You claimed that the Sinai was the
# home of Israel.
 
	That was an anology, i.e. similar logic.  A possesion does not
have to be the home of the owner.

# >   # >   # >  ... the overwhelming majority
# >   # >   # >   of the terrorism was (as it still is) commited by the Arabs against
# >   # >   # >   the Jews.
 
# >   # >   # Substantiate, please.

# >   # >	   World events.

# >   # Great quote.  I'll have to remember that catch-all reference when I
# >   # write my next term paper.  See footnote 3.
# >   # -----
# >   # 3.  World events.

# >	   Your the one that claims to have read a lot and to be well
# >   informed.  For you, this should be sufficient.
 
# I apologize for my severe sarcasm.  It was uncalled for.  I guess I
# just didn't think that "World events" was much of a response to a
# request for substantiation.

	It should not be were the facts are readily verifyable.
--

David Makowsky
makowsky@enuxha.eas.asu.edu