🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <JIME.92Apr15124737@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu> jime@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert x6127 g41) writes:
|In article <1992Apr15.140120.8193@ennews.eas.asu.edu> makowsky@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (David Makowsky) writes:
|>   In article <1992Apr13.203813.19355@techbook.com> gummitch@techbook.com (Jeff Frane) writes:
|>   # Aha!  Now we begin to get the idea.  If an act of resistance (such as
|>   # blowing up a hotel serving as British headquarters and killing innocent
|>   # Arabs, Jews and British) is committed by Zionists, it is NOT terrorism.
|>   # If a similar act, of course, was committed by Palestinians (note,
|>   # Makowsky, no cute ?) then it would be a heinous terrorist act.

|>	   Not at all.  I suggest you do two things.  Go read about what
|>   actually happened at the King David hotel (and why it had to happen),
|>   and shut up when you do not know what you are talking about.

|I _have_ read about what actually happened at the King David Hotel.
|It had all the hallmarks of a well-planned terrorist attack, including
|the proverbial warning phone call (which was ignored by the British),
|and timing with another terrorist attack elsewhere.

Which other terorist attacks have been preceded by phone calls telling
when and where they would take place?  Am I missing a serious chunck
of history?

Adam


Adam Shostack 					adam@das.harvard.edu

What a terrible thing to have lost one's .sig.  Or not to have a .sig
at all.  How true that is.