🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Apr16.232347.13363@das.harvard.edu> adam@endor.uucp (Adam Shostack) writes:
>In article <JIME.92Apr15124737@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu> jime@bullwinkle.atc.ll.mit.edu (Jim Eggert x6127 g41) writes:
>|In article <1992Apr15.140120.8193@ennews.eas.asu.edu> makowsky@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (David Makowsky) writes:
>|>   In article <1992Apr13.203813.19355@techbook.com> gummitch@techbook.com (Jeff Frane) writes:
>|>   # Aha!  Now we begin to get the idea.  If an act of resistance (such as
>|>   # blowing up a hotel serving as British headquarters and killing innocent
>|>   # Arabs, Jews and British) is committed by Zionists, it is NOT terrorism.
>|>   # If a similar act, of course, was committed by Palestinians (note,
>|>   # Makowsky, no cute ?) then it would be a heinous terrorist act.
>
>|>	   Not at all.  I suggest you do two things.  Go read about what
>|>   actually happened at the King David hotel (and why it had to happen),
>|>   and shut up when you do not know what you are talking about.
>
>|I _have_ read about what actually happened at the King David Hotel.
>|It had all the hallmarks of a well-planned terrorist attack, including
>|the proverbial warning phone call (which was ignored by the British),
>|and timing with another terrorist attack elsewhere.
>
>Which other terorist attacks have been preceded by phone calls telling
>when and where they would take place?  Am I missing a serious chunck
>of history?

Off the top of my head, the IRA is a huge example.

>
>Adam
>
>
>Adam Shostack 					adam@das.harvard.edu
>
>What a terrible thing to have lost one's .sig.  Or not to have a .sig
>at all.  How true that is.      


-- 
Anwar Mohammed                           Graduate Student
anwar+@cs.cmu.edu  (NeXTmail welcome)    School of Computer Science
Voice: +1 412 268 3043                   Carnegie-Mellon University
Fax:   +1 412 681 5739                   Pittsburgh, PA  15213-3890