Article View: misc.headlines
Article #546Re: Schmidling is simply wrong.
From: Danny Keren
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 23:34
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 23:34
47 lines
2614 bytes
2614 bytes
eggertj@atc.ll.mit.edu writes: # #According to Steven, the attack on the Liberty was by no means a #mistake. The CIA, Navy inquiry committee, defense secretary McNamara and others disagree. #(I know that has been hashed out on the net already, but go #on.) The Israelis had been intercepting radio transmissions from #Cairo and rebroadcasting them to Jordan in a modified form, making the #war news sound like Egypt was winning. An insane fairy tale which was never proved, and lies beyond the realm of the possible. Are you really suggesting that the famous phone conversation between Nasser and Hussein was altered by the Israelis? And all this while Egyptian radio was broadcasting day and night that "Tel-Aviv is burning"? Where's the logic? If any, Egypt would want Jordan to join in the war, to keep the pressure of it by opening a second front. #This was an obvious attempt to #lure Jordan into the war, which succeeded. No. Jordan declared, again and again, that it will join any war between Egypt and Israel. What makes the above even more absurd is that Israel warned Jordan *twice* (via UN General Bull) to stay out of the war, but Jordan continued shelling Jerusalem and the coastal region, leaving Israel no choice but to go to war with it. #The Liberty was listening #in on this, and the Americans found out what the Israelis were up to, #and told the Israelis as much. With the Israeli deception unmasked, #the Israelis didn't want any other secrets snooped on, and felt forced #to bomb the USS Liberty (after asking that it be removed, and seeing #that it wasn't moving). What makes this story even more illogical is the fact that the Liberty was attacked near the end of the war, when a cease-fire has already been signed with Jordan, and the war with Egypt was all but over (a cease-fire was signed the same evening). There was simply no reason for Israel to attack the ship. I have never seen any of the "delibarate attack" advocates come up with any motive strong enough to justify his theory. -Danny Keren.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug12.233436.3529@cs.brown.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!brunix!brunix!dzkShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.headlines,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideast,alt.conspiracy,alt.censorship,soc.rights.human,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.arabic Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!brunix!brunix!dzk From: dzk@cs.brown.edu (Danny Keren) Subject: Re: Schmidling is simply wrong. Message-ID: <1992Aug12.233436.3529@cs.brown.edu> Followup-To: talk.politics.mideast Sender: news@cs.brown.edu Organization: Brown University Department of Computer Science Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 23:34:36 GMT Lines: 49