Article View: misc.headlines
Article #566Re: More Sarajevo notes
From: Stupendous Man
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 19:13
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 19:13
54 lines
2874 bytes
2874 bytes
In article <12AUG199221570952@amarna.gsfc.nasa.gov>, packer@amarna.gsfc.nasa.gov (Charles Packer) writes: > Still not much has been published in the way of pictures > of the alleged destruction of Sarajevo. There are two possible > reasons for this: > > 1. There is no destruction, after all; to some degree or other, > it's a hoax. > > 2. There is destruction, but the media are waiting to release > pictures to coincide with some event in the offing. You forgot 3) Your just not looking hard enough, or you are unwilling to accept evidence you do see. I see pics of Sarajevo every night on the news. They've been in the paper often. Today's paper carrier the headline: SERBS ROUT THOUSANDS: UN decires eviction of Muslims > Those familiar with my other postings will know that I've > favored (1), but it's worth considering (2) in the light of all > the talk about the expected UN resolution to use force to > protect their relief effort. The deployment of troops, including > Americans, to carry out this resolution could be the event for > which they're waiting. In either case, such news management > would be easy to bring off because the public, not able to > imagine who could benefit from the ploy, would never recognize > that it was happening. Reaching a bit, aren't we? There's no reason it even has to be the US that goes in. > Speaking of American troops, I read that a general told > Congress yesterday that > > "...it may be one of the prerequisites for that > happening successfully [i.e. deployment of troops] > is to build a permissive environment [in Bosnia] through > political and diplomatic action." > > I can just hear him at his =next= meeting with Congress, > when it's demanded of him that he explain what he was > talking about: "Senator, I meant to say that we cannot > risk the use of FORCE until PEACE comes to the area! He meant that he cannot insert troops until a zone of safety appears. Inserting troops into a hostile environment gets them killed very quickly. Brett _______________________________________________________________________________ Proconsul Computer Consulting CHA-CHING! Better, Cheaper, Faster (Pick any two :) Disclaimer: NOT!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug13.141339.3437@desire.wright.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!desire.wright.edu!demonReferences:
<12AUG199221570952@amarna.gsfc.nasa.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!desire.wright.edu!demon From: demon@desire.wright.edu (Stupendous Man) Newsgroups: misc.headlines,soc.culture.yugoslavia Subject: Re: More Sarajevo notes Message-ID: <1992Aug13.141339.3437@desire.wright.edu> Date: 13 Aug 92 19:13:39 GMT References: <12AUG199221570952@amarna.gsfc.nasa.gov> Organization: Demonic Possesions, Inc. Lines: 54