Article View: misc.headlines
Article #578Re: WORLD GOVERNMENT
From: Michael Friedman
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 14:14
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 14:14
66 lines
3248 bytes
3248 bytes
In article <1992Aug12.145919.6175@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca> bunker@physun.physics.mcmaster.ca (Alex Bunker) writes: >The reason I want >a world government 1) > >The level of injustice in the world without >one I find intolerable. I look at SU:Afganistan etc... > and USA:Chile etc... as examples >of big rich nations picking on smaller nations and working for the interests >of a subset of the human race at the expense of the whole. Mind explaining why a WG would improve this? Just for an example, I bet it would be pretty easy to get a billion or so Chinese to vote that China should continue to administer Tibet even under a WG. Do you really think enough other people would care enough to vote against them? >Some nations >through military strength have taken more than their fair share of >the worlds rescounces. You mean like the Soviet Union? Well, we seem to have corrected that problem without a WG. >What gives the right to the USA to use up >10 times as much unrenuewable rescource per capita than another >country? The fact that we pay for them. >2) >there are issues of a global scale that are not >dealt with properly because we are missing the level of government >that can best deal with this. These issues are population control, Are you really willing to live with a Chinese style birth control program? >environmental degredation, Most of the world's people are in the Third World. Should we drop our environmental regs to their level? >peace and security, Given that nations can't do a very good job of guaranteeing these within their borders why should a WG be any better? >Labor legislation (to ensure an even global economic playing field) Why should we have an even global economic playing field? If people want luxuries like six week vacations why shouldn't they pay for them? >I am not asking for >an allpowerful monolith to dictate everything but a legislature to >take care of these issue which would not be taken care of otherwise >is all I am calling for. Ah. OK. Now how do you keep it like that? Are you aware of how small the Federal government was supposed to be? And looks what it's grown into. Now how do you prevent that from happening to the WG? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am not an official Oracle spokesman. I speak for myself and no one else.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug14.141439.17700@oracle.us.oracle.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!decwrl!oracle!unrepliable!bounceReferences:
<1992Aug12.010339.14687@news.unomaha.edu> <1992Aug12.025352.7653@ncar.ucar.edu> <1992Aug12.145919.6175@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!decwrl!oracle!unrepliable!bounce
From: mfriedma@uucp (Michael Friedman)
Newsgroups: misc.headlines,alt.activism,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: WORLD GOVERNMENT
Message-ID: <1992Aug14.141439.17700@oracle.us.oracle.com>
Date: 14 Aug 92 14:14:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: oracle.1992Aug14.141439.17700
References: <1992Aug12.010339.14687@news.unomaha.edu> <1992Aug12.025352.7653@ncar.ucar.edu> <1992Aug12.145919.6175@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca>
Sender: usenet@oracle.us.oracle.com (Oracle News Poster)
Organization: Oracle Corporation
Lines: 66
Nntp-Posting-Host: appseq
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
at Oracle Corporation. The opinions expressed are those
of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.