Article View: misc.headlines
Article #631Re: WORLD GOVERNMENT
From: David Veal
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 00:18
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 00:18
86 lines
4870 bytes
4870 bytes
In article <1992Aug18.155310.18355@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca> bunker@physun.physics.mcmaster.ca (Alex Bunker) writes:
>> Well, there goes the freedom of expression. How many other freedoms are you
>> planning to trash on your way to an all-Good, all-knowing, all-wonderful
>> world government? It's beginning to sound more and more like 1984 to me.
>>
>>ab> Television will become more educational and less commercially-consumer
>>ab> advocating pander to the lowest common denomenator.
>>
>> Interesting. Get rid of ads, and we get better TV. Um, how does this TV
>> get paid for in the first place? Advertisers. You make it sound as though
>> advertising itself is some kind of evil thing. Sorry, but if you remember
>> creating a resume, you were advertising yourself. Basically, without it,
>> the flow of information decreases greatly. Again, your future world sounds
>> less and less inviting and desirable the more you talk about it.
>>
>>ab> Look the best television is on the channels without commercials PBS TVO
>>ab> BBC etc...
>>
>> Here in the US, the Discovery channel and A&E are doing quite well, and
>> presenting quite good TV, with commercials too! I think I'll take a stu-
>> pid commercial every 15 minutes over interminable "pledge drives" any day.
>>
>> Believe it or not, capitalism is not the source of every stinking festering
>> problem facing the world. If there's one thing your posts indicate, you
>> have become radicalized by reading the Net. I remember a kindler, gentler
>> Alex Bunker a short time back. Relax, and get mellow. No need to sound so
>> final and declarative and know-it-all.
>>
>>--
>>Gary Strand Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are
>>strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF
>
>There seems to be a misunderstanding here my comments on television
>and advertising have NOTHING to do with world government. We got sidetracked
>and they are a seperate issue. I do not particularly like commercial television
>because it is not a free form of expression because it is beholden to
>the views of the advertisers.
Thems that pays the bills gets to call the shots. Or, more
accurately, "He who has the gold makes the rules."
>We see this in comparing PBS to A&E.
The Discovery Channel was brought up above. It's an excellent channel
with a lot of good programs. And commercials.
>The
>quality and intellectual depth and vartiety of perspectives available
>on PBS is FAR greater than pathetic ultraconservative A&E (the
>standup comedy-documentaries about war from a hawkish perspective channel)
>I want a TRULY free form of expression.
You mean where somebody comes into your home and builds you a
broadcast tower for free? Such things are expensive. If you don't
believe me, buy a television spot.
>What is commercially viable is
>not free.
Nothing is free. If its not commercially viable, who are you going
to get to pay for it? The taxpayers? Why should they pay for your speech?
Is *everybody* going to get their own broadcast tower?
>What about programming that is anti-capitalist?
Obviously the capitalists aren't going to pay for attacks against
them. Somehow the idea of letting somebody use *my* lawn to shout that
I'm evil and corrupt at my house doesn't seem very appealing to me.
>or exposes great wrongs in the consumerist status quo?
>We do not get
>to see these shows because the advertisers hold the networks in blackmail.
The advertisers say, "We'll pay you money for this." That's not
blackmail. Why should the advertisers be *forced* to pay for something
they don't like.
I don't see you advertising in your signature that world government
is a stupid idea. A lot of people think that. Why are you only presenting
*your* view?
===========================================================================
|David Veal PA146008@utkvm1.utk.edu University of Tennessee |
| Division of Continuing Education |
===========================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<PA146008.245.714183518@utkvm1.utk.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!utkcs2!utkux1.utk.edu!utkvm1.utk.edu!PA146008References:
<1992Aug17.204231.27166@news.unomaha.edu> <1992Aug18.000835.13690@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca> <1992Aug18.050634.14094@ncar.ucar.edu> <1992Aug18.155310.18355@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!utkcs2!utkux1.utk.edu!utkvm1.utk.edu!PA146008 From: PA146008@utkvm1.utk.edu (David Veal) Newsgroups: misc.headlines,alt.activism,talk.politics.misc Subject: Re: WORLD GOVERNMENT Message-ID: <PA146008.245.714183518@utkvm1.utk.edu> Date: 19 Aug 92 00:18:38 GMT References: <1992Aug17.204231.27166@news.unomaha.edu> <1992Aug18.000835.13690@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca> <1992Aug18.050634.14094@ncar.ucar.edu> <1992Aug18.155310.18355@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca> Sender: usenet@utkux1.utk.edu (USENET News System) Organization: University of Tennessee Division of Continuing Education Lines: 86