Article View: misc.headlines
Article #642Re: Intellectuals and totalitarianism
From: Gary Strand
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 20:59
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 20:59
83 lines
4827 bytes
4827 bytes
ab> Alex Bunker gs> Gary Strand ab> [I]n general blue collar workers and lefty intellectuals belong to the ab> same political party and have the same voting habits. I am talking about ab> a global average here. You mean a Western European average. Strange how the voting habits and po- litical outlook of 250 million Americans counts much less than the same of ~300 million Europeans. Methinks you're stuck on the old pre-WWI European view of itself, ie, a shining beacon unto the world of groping-in-the-dark masses. Sorry, but that just isn't true any more. gs> In any case, your average lefty intellectual is so far removed from basic gs> theories on government power, economics, and monetary policies, that it's gs> no wonder that wherever and whenever their ideas have been tried, (at best) gs> the society as a whole has remained stuck, or has declined. I am including gs> Sweden, Norway, Germany, France, and so on here too. ab> HA HA HA HA HA AH A !!!!!! ab> This is very funny. You just mentioned a set of countries EVERY one of ab> which has a healthier economy than the US as well as being more socially ab> advanced. Prove it. Show that these economies during the period from (say) 1950-today have been historically more healthy than the US' economy, controlling for non-economic factors, so that we can see whether or not your contention that Eurosocialism is the wave of the present and the future. Also, your claims to a greater degree of "social advancement" sound remarkably hollow and biased. Where were fascism, Naziism, and Communism invented? Not in the US, I can assure you. Also, which countries started WWI and WWII? ab> how are these societies stuck or declining. AND THE USA IS NOT!?!?!?!?! The US is declining, as are all other countries, in direct proportion to the amount of State control over the economy. ab> These countries are kicking the US economic butt by government involvment ab> in economic policy. I guess this explains why the socialists are getting kicked out, and those that remain are dropping their socialist ideals very quickly. ab> US stype capitalism without a government industrial policy is the stuck ab> declining failure. Luckily (for Americans) YOU are in the minority and ab> the majority of americans realize this and are about to elect Bill Clin- ab> ton as the next president who will invoke an industrial policy. If you think Bill Clinton can save the American economy, I've got a bridge and a set of crown jewels for sale. Indeed, there is an undercurrent of pseudo-guerilla thinking in that Clinton ought to be elected, so that the US will be driven into the ground faster, and then we can start doing it all right that much sooner. ab> Well maybe thay wont and America will continue to be a proud but pathetic ab> economic laughingstock naively convincing itself that it is the best ab> country in the world just because the rest of the world lets you have ab> your fun playing global bouncer! Ummm, I wonder what your parents and grandparents have to say about the US. I take your views as seriously as I take those of college-age Americans, which is to say that they "benefit" from having all of 5 years worth of memories, and an accompanying inability to understand history or the rea- sons why things are the way they are. You are the same way. It's really quite easy to become oh-so-stereotypically-European-snobbish towards the US, because you don't remember or understand the role the US has played since WWI in keeping Europe at least semi-stable and prosperous. ab> Your average Joe Bluecollar steelworker is a very sensible fellow and ab> knows who's side he is on. gs> It isn't on the side of the socialist intellectuals, I can tell you that. ab> Last time I checked he is (In most countries) Again, your narrow view prevents you from understanding that when you say "most countries", you mean "most Western European countries". -- Gary Strand Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug19.205950.5172@ncar.ucar.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!ncar!colossus.cgd.ucar.edu!garyReferences:
<1992Aug19.134718.25883@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca> <1992Aug19.170820.12325@ncar.ucar.edu> <1992Aug19.202256.28603@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.headlines,alt.activism,talk.politics.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!ncar!colossus.cgd.ucar.edu!gary From: gary@colossus.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand) Subject: Re: Intellectuals and totalitarianism Message-ID: <1992Aug19.205950.5172@ncar.ucar.edu> Sender: news@ncar.ucar.edu (USENET Maintenance) Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Division/NCAR, Boulder, CO References: <1992Aug19.134718.25883@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca> <1992Aug19.170820.12325@ncar.ucar.edu> <1992Aug19.202256.28603@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 20:59:50 GMT Lines: 83