🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <24AUG199208180727@amarna.gsfc.nasa.gov> packer@amarna.gsfc.nasa.gov (Charles Packer) writes:
>This wasn't a problem for the Mafia who killed that Sicilian official
>last April! I recall that the news accounts said something like
>they planted "several hundred pounds" explosive "under a roadway."
>I don't know whether the road was paved, though.

Come on, Packer! You're reaching now. If you had read the entire post (or
it may have been another one---it's hard to keep up with all the rebuffs
to your tired tirades), you would have realized that the mines could
have been _purposely_ placed _in_the_road_.

We'll go through it again, slowly.

	Faction A uses a lot of sniper attacks against Faction B.

	Faction A wants a lot of Faction B to be out in the open
	so their sniper attacks work.

	Faction B wants to quickly drive armored vehicles through
	possible sniper areas to avoid being out in the open.

	Faction A wants Faction B to get out of their moving armored
	vehicles, so Faction A puts mines in the roadway.

	Faction B wants to go through the area, but they cannot just
	drive over the mines as if they were normal blockages.

	Faction B must get out of their vehicles to either disarm the
	mines or move them out of the way.

	Faction A opens up with sniper fire.

Get it? This explains all your "misgivings" about the picture. Now
get a life.

-- 
|~~\ rian        2000 Powers Fy Rd. |  "You can't call me 'Booger' anymore,
|--< _____       Suite 200          | 	  I'm too cool." 
|__/   |         Marietta, Ga 30067 |  "Yeah...you can't call me 'Skidmark'
       | roxell  (404)933-7600      |     anymore, either."