🚀 go-pugleaf

al@gtx.com (Alan Filipski) writes:
>In article <1990Dec4.145421.25102@engin.umich.edu> picard@caen.engin.umich.e
onald V >Picard) writes:
>>In article <1990Nov5.224851.19579@nntp-server.caltech.edu> dicely@nntp-serv
ltech.edu >>(Christopher M. Dicely) writes:
>>>btiffany@pbs.org writes:
>
>>>>        *  $19,000,000 to study bovine flatulence.
>>>Yes, but recent preliminary studies have revealed that this ("cow gas") ma
 
>>>the most significant contributor to the greenhouse affect, or at least amo
>>>the more significant ones, and that it may be reducable by dietary changes
>
>>Sorry, this is a lie put out by the new pro-vegetarian groups.  It is
>>a much easier target to say we shouldn't eat meat or the world will be
>>destroyed, than convincing us we're immoral for eating meat.
>
>>Check out the groups supporting this statement and the obvious solution.
> .
> .
> .
>
>2) What "obvious solution" do you mean?
 
All cows must get cattle-lytic converters.  Existing cows would have
to be retro-fitted.  Obviously.
 
--Daniel                                      Disclaimer: "Naaah."