Article View: misc.headlines
Article #89Re: Schmidling is simply wrong.
From: Mark
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 08:33
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 08:33
41 lines
2899 bytes
2899 bytes
In article <EGGERTJ.92Aug3182009@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu> eggertj@atc.ll.mit.edu writes: >In article <1992Aug2.112925.22708@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> markr@mot.com (Mark) writes: >> In article <EGGERTJ.92Jul30165655@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu> eggertj@atc.ll.mit.edu writes: >> >I don't understand what you mean when you say that Israel has been one >> >of the USA's most steadfast allies. Do you mean that the US has, in >> >time of need, been able to go to Israel for help? Do you mean that >> >Israel has done its best to do what the US wants it to do? Please >> >explain. >> >> Well, militarily, the US and Israel have a number of joint projects currently, as >> well as having purchased each others technology. (Arrow missile, pilotless planes, >> tank armor improvements, etc.) Non-militarily, the US and Israel have a free >> trade agreement. (furniture, clothing, etc.) I believe the US and Israel have >> common voting patterns in the UN. During the Gulf war, Israel stayed out at >> the request of the US. > >Militarily, Israel has developed the atomic bomb, much to the chagrin >of the US. They did so in part by stealing nuclear materials from the >US. Israel is an ally, not a puppet. And the US has also developed an A-bomb, so what ? And when did they steal nuclear materials ? > They have also spied extensively on us (the Pollard case is just >what has been discovered and revealed). They have been accused of >selling US military technology to China and South Africa. If you bothered to follow up the China story, it was Israeli technology. And, how do *you* know so much about unrevealed spying ? >Non-militarily US-Israeli trade couldn't make a fly sneeze. The US >and Israel have common voting patterns in the UN, mostly because the >US is backing Israel on a lot of Mideast resolutions. During the Gulf >war, Israel stayed out as the result of about 3 minutes of reflection >on the cost and benefits of bombing Iraq. You are wrong about this, lots of high level debate in the Israeli govt. went on during the gulf war. I highly doubt that the votes against attacking Iraq were many more than those favoring an attack. Mark
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug4.083328.13647@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ftpbox!mothost!lmpsbbs!markrReferences:
<EGGERTJ.92Jul30165655@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu> <1992Aug2.112925.22708@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> <EGGERTJ.92Aug3182009@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: misc.headlines,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideast,soc.culture.arabic,alt.conspiracy,alt.censorship,soc.rights.human,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ftpbox!mothost!lmpsbbs!markr From: markr@mot.com (Mark) Subject: Re: Schmidling is simply wrong. Reply-To: markr@mcil.comm.mot.com Organization: MCIL Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1992 08:33:28 GMT Message-ID: <1992Aug4.083328.13647@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> References: <EGGERTJ.92Jul30165655@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu> <1992Aug2.112925.22708@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> <EGGERTJ.92Aug3182009@moses.atc.ll.mit.edu> Sender: news@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com (Net News) Nntp-Posting-Host: 145.9.14.26 Lines: 42