Thread View: misc.headlines
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Morris the Cat
Fri, 14 Aug 1992 15:58
Re: Scudbusters
Author: Morris the Cat
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 15:58
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 15:58
23 lines
1555 bytes
1555 bytes
In <1992Aug14.150800.5879@cs.brown.edu> Danny Keren states: |#Remind me, is this the same Israeli AF that executed the infamous |#attack against the slow-moving, non-stealthy, and ill-defended USS |#Liberty? A ship the Israelis couldn't identify after hours of recon, |#and didn't after three attack waves? Or so goes the official story... |# |#Seems to me that either the Israelis aren't so hot at identifying and |#killing targets after all, or that the Liberty story as told in public |#is wrong. Take your choice. |Mistakes happen in war, even to the best and most expereinced air-forces. Hmm, interestingly enough, I happened across a letter written by a member of the USS Liberty Veterans Association several years ago [NOT James Ennes] to a magazine. He makes it clear that ECM pods carried onboard Mirage IIIs (I believe that's the designation of the Israeli Mirages.) were set for U.S. Navy communications frequencies, AND WERE NOT WIDEBAND JAMMING. This clearly indicates Israeli knowledge of the USS Liberty as an American vessel and not of any combatant.
Re: Scudbusters
Author: David Makowsky
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 22:46
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 22:46
37 lines
2261 bytes
2261 bytes
In article <1992Aug14.155840.8387@cbnewsc.cb.att.com> rats@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (Morris the Cat) writes: # In <1992Aug14.150800.5879@cs.brown.edu> Danny Keren states: # |#Remind me, is this the same Israeli AF that executed the infamous # |#attack against the slow-moving, non-stealthy, and ill-defended USS # |#Liberty? A ship the Israelis couldn't identify after hours of recon, # |#and didn't after three attack waves? Or so goes the official story... # |#Seems to me that either the Israelis aren't so hot at identifying and # |#killing targets after all, or that the Liberty story as told in public # |#is wrong. Take your choice. # |Mistakes happen in war, even to the best and most expereinced air-forces. # Hmm, interestingly enough, I happened across a letter written by a # member of the USS Liberty Veterans Association several years ago [NOT # James Ennes] to a magazine. He makes it clear that ECM pods carried # onboard Mirage IIIs (I believe that's the designation of the Israeli # Mirages.) were set for U.S. Navy communications frequencies, AND WERE # NOT WIDEBAND JAMMING. Do you (or perhaps the author of that letter) know anything about the laws of physics, radio frequencies, military intelligence, counter intelligence? # This clearly indicates Israeli knowledge of the USS Liberty as an # American vessel and not of any combatant. Correct. By the way, how come you log on as 'rats' and not your real name, which I remember to be D Woo. At any rate, you once posted something blaming Jews for antisemitism since some Jews support gun control. I take everything you write as absurd. -- David Makowsky makowsky@enuxha.eas.asu.edu
Re: Scudbusters
Author: Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 08:13
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 08:13
55 lines
2724 bytes
2724 bytes
In article <1992Aug14.224611.19196@ennews.eas.asu.edu>, makowsky@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (David Makowsky) writes: |>In article <1992Aug14.155840.8387@cbnewsc.cb.att.com> |>rats@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (Morris the Cat) writes: |> |># In <1992Aug14.150800.5879@cs.brown.edu> Danny Keren states: |> |># |#Remind me, is this the same Israeli AF that executed the infamous |># |#attack against the slow-moving, non-stealthy, and ill-defended |>USS |># |#Liberty? A ship the Israelis couldn't identify after hours of |>recon, |># |#and didn't after three attack waves? Or so goes the official |>story... |> |># |#Seems to me that either the Israelis aren't so hot at identifying |>and |># |#killing targets after all, or that the Liberty story as told in |>public |># |#is wrong. Take your choice. |> |># |Mistakes happen in war, even to the best and most expereinced |>air-forces. |> |># Hmm, interestingly enough, I happened across a letter written by a |># member of the USS Liberty Veterans Association several years ago |>[NOT |># James Ennes] to a magazine. He makes it clear that ECM pods carried |>|># onboard Mirage IIIs (I believe that's the designation of the |>Israeli |># Mirages.) were set for U.S. Navy communications frequencies, AND |>WERE |># NOT WIDEBAND JAMMING. |> |> Do you (or perhaps the author of that letter) know anything about |>the laws of physics, radio frequencies, military intelligence, |>counter |>intelligence? Perhaps someone could publish a list of these "US Navy frequencies"? It sounds awfuly decent of them to stick to the same ones all the time. I read in Spycatcher that we Brits are dastardly enough to keep changing ours so as to avoid jamming! Perhaps the US should consider buying some of our British Communications gear with these modern features? BTW what particular logic was there in setting a post about Israeli jamming to US distribution only? For what it's worth I don't think that Jakes comparison of the Osirak incident with the Gulf war is appropriate. Comparing single missions with battles or entire wars is futile. Phill Hallam-Baker
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads