🚀 go-pugleaf

Since you all always claim to yourselves the credentials of
psychiatrists as the Communists and Nazis did, what do you think of
your friends here posting that all non-Catholics must die, which you
obviously agree with and for years have shown yourselves unable to
condemn?

Here it is:

Dear friends: 
Here we are again with an urgent appeal to you. Things have gotten so
out of hand, that we wonder why even try. Viewing that the issues at
hand involve much blood however, we have to ask again and try again.
It is not a pleasant task, but we have to do it. Feast your eyes on
the following very incredible posts. They represent a nightmare we
have been facing for years. Some of the most amazing people capable of
acts no criminal in jail can commit have been getting bolder and
bolder in their posts on the newsgroups. Their boldness corresponds to
the actions of those currently in leadership capacity in the United
States and all over the world specifically in government, media,
education and even religion. As events toward change move more and
more rapidly they become more and more bold. Take a look at these
taken from the Google Newsgroups Archives.  We first meet a poster who
is very very upset about something.  What is he upset about?...



From: Shan (shankarees@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF
ALL NON-CATHOLICS! 
Date: 2003-10-22 05:57:44 PST 

I want you Harlot Bitch Whore SUSAN and your
cohorts to die.

ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND JEHOVAH'S NUTNESSES ARE FROM
SATAN AND MUST DIE.

Shan

  
[Look at what he is writing.  You can see he is more than upset.  What
could have caused him to be this upset?  Surely, you must be saying,
he is just a little perturbed and doesn't mean what he is saying.  Is
that true?  Watch now as he makes sure that everyone understands
clearly what he is writing...] 


From: Shan (shankarees@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF
ALL NON-CATHOLICS! 
Date: 2003-10-20 14:59:55 PST 

Hey Harlot Susan Whore, for your sake, just to please your evil
nature, I am going to write it down in uppercase:

I THE UNDERSIGNED CONDEMN ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND
JEHOVAH'S NUTNESS TO EXTERMINATION.

ALL OTHER PROTESTANTS ARE SPARED.

SHAN
  
[Just to please my evil nature he says, he writes words like these
during our "new day" when terrorism has become a big issue. Now, isn't
it better to joke about a bomb in an airport? Only just to please my
nature?  Notice how he says all other Protestants are spared?  You
must have guessed by now that he is Catholic, or rather, a Jesuit.
That we define as a footsoldier of the Pope who even engages in
subversion, and has the same mind as the Inquisitors of the Dark Ages.
Actually we more specifically believe that he is a member of Opus Dei.
Here are some more.  Look at this very strange post in answer to
another very caustic individual named "Alan"...]

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=c59f85ea.0402091253.73035ff0%40posting.google.com



From: Susan Williams (SWilliams07171964III@hotmail.com)
Subject: Re: I have a devil in my house 
"Alan M" <nospam@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:<vtKVb.48994$Wa.1240@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> "Lester T. Linpord" <Lester_t_linpord@yahoo.co.in> wrote in message
> news:bb97ab58.0402080059.15bb7773@posting.google.com...
> > But he is a sweet little baby devil and a nice pet.
> >
> > Do you think devils are good pets or will they eat you someday?

Alan: 
> Is this little devil called Ted McMillan ?

I know for a fact that Ted is not little.  Not only is he so hung he
can suck himself, but I can take it all the way down. Try that,
jesuit!

In His Grace,


Susan



[This post has my name on it, but I did not write this post. The same
one by the name of "Shan" most likely wrote it.  
Several times people like him have been without conscience enough to
fabricate posts as if they were sent by me. In this case you can tell
it is not me who posted by the email address.  He knows that most
would get caught on this.  The email address shown there is
SWilliams07171964III@hotmail.com. Notice the three (3) "I"s before the
"@" sign? My actual email address has two (2) "I"s. Time and time
again they showcase how unscrupulous they are and taunt us into
thinking they have a real advantage. But we don't desire to be like
them. They think their behavior merits more rewards for them in
heaven. We know better!  But by looking at their talents, and then
sitting down and thinking, you would be able to more and more
understand what the future is for the world.

Here he calls the name "Ted." He is referring to Ted McMillan, who is
a good friend of mine who has had to face them like me. Ted is
super-intelligent to the point where they constantly also call him
insane, sick, etc., but leech on to his posts for dear emergency. They
know his posts reveal the truth.  Why else would they constantly trail
his posts, calling them insane, and leave the rest of the internet
neglected?  I learned much of what I know through Ted McMillan.  

It is always important for them to smother out what Brother Ted is
saying. He reveals who they are and what they are up to. That's when
he was posting on the newsgroups.  He was usually the editor of my
posts.  You see and notice the boldness of the posts above, and can't
imagine that to even be bold enough to post like that tells you they
seem to know something about the times and about THE GOVERNMENT!
Shan continues here below, in this case posting along with another one
attacking us named "Alan" for the same reasons and on the same
premise.  What reasons are they?...] 
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=c59f85ea.0401211522.34c85ac0%40posting.google.com


From: Susan Williams (SWilliams07171964III@hotmail.com)
Subject: Re: #HAIRY-LEGGED SUSAN ACTUALLY MAN NAMED TED McMILLAN!!
MAJOR expose! 
Date: 2004-01-21 15:22:23 PST 

"Alan M" <nospam@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:<HYOOb.18611$Wa.10551@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> "Teresita" <teresita@newsguy.com> wrote in message
> news:buem8101ike@drn.newsguy.com...
> > It's true!
> >
 
Alan:
> Gasp. Ted must shortly be due to stump his way around the well worn track
> again.

But Ted's lovely hot stump is almost as good as yours. At least one of
the best Jesuits I've had. But we all know what you are really after.

<snip>
  
This post again was not written by me.  Brother Ted revealed that they
are Jesuits, or rather foot-soldiers of the Pope though they profess
to come from different denominations or even claim to be Seventh-day
Adventists: that is, INFILTRATORS. They therefore have to do 
anything possible to take people off the track that they really are
Jesuits. The most popular tactic is to make jokes against the facts. 
Obviously the man posting above and then impersonating me is very
angry. What could have caused him to get to this state? Amazingly it
was because some friends of his made some other very bold posts. 
Here is his explanation of what we did that raised his dander.  He
here speaks to one claiming to be a Seventh-day Adventist named
"Andrew" who also hates us no bounds:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl2218492349d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=71bd538c.0404011554.1c309a11%40posting.google.com
From: Shan (shankarees@yahoo.com)
Subject: Attack Catholicism & Suffer Consequences SDAs or Others 
Date: 2004-04-01 15:54:41 PST 

Andrew,
Search for "Sonny Maou" and you would know waht happened. 
I am sick and tired of reading attacks on everything relating to my
faith, Catholicism.

I am not willing to tolerate it any longer for anybodies sake, include
yours.

The ex-Archbishop of Canterburry was blamed recently for his remarks
on Muslim leaders because he said they do not condemn terrorism.
You, Andrew and other good Christians, are doing the same like Muslim
leaders because you do not lift a finger to condemn those who are
constantly attacking my faith beginning with this Sonny Maou who maybe
a reincarnation of the harlot man/woman Susan, Cindy or whatever these
idiots call themselves.

[Watch as Shan now accuses us of doing just what he has done in
sending email that impersonates me...]

It is very easy to create a bogus e-mail and sign in as someone else
so Susan maybe Sonny or anybody.

This situation will not be tolerated no matter what.  Simply put,
anybody who attacks my faith will receive response in ten
folds.  I am the first to criticize clergy but I will not permit
anybody to attack the faith and go unpunished.

Shan

Notice his ancient or "inquisitor" style of speaking?  As you can see
here, he claims we attacked Rome.  Is that true?  Well what would it
look like to you if we witnessed posters on the internet TELLING US
THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS SHOULD BE EXTERMINATED, and that it is "JUST
BUSINESS" TO EXTERMINATE THEM?  Would you be upset about that?  Well
some posters sent posts with those exact words and meaning.  We, being
non-Catholics no less, were very upset about it.  We exposed those
posters AND THE OTHERS WHO DEFENDED THEM.  That is what Shan is angry
about.

They first made many posts against the principles of the American
Constitution and the document itself. They then also made posts
against basic liberty. In this, they presented themselves as mere
debaters claiming they had a right to their opinions while they were
doing that. They referred to the American position as "REBELLION" and
called true Americans "rebels." Some may realize that these words
sound very familiar historically. 

The problem is that we understood they were killers. Anyone who
condemns the principles of liberty and the American Constitution are
KILLERS. The American people have come a long way into forgetting this
at their own future tragedy and expense. So then what happened? The
only natural consistent result whether by experience or in written
thought would be those same people ultimately being 
understood to be killers, and that worse than any that can be found in
our jails!


A man by the name of Ted Seeber first posted his approval throughout
history of Rome persecuting and killing Protestants. He claimed with
approval that Rome "persecuted the Christians" because they "didn't
live the bible." He said they merely lived their interpretation of the
bible. A problem thence arose when we put his statement in its true
light, for he spoke in the present tense.

He had earlier given condolences to the victims of the 911 tragedy. We
merely asked him how many of them "lived the bible." We then pointed
out that he made such remarks just after Prime Minister Tony Blair
defined terrorists as people who have a terrible disrespect for human
life. He made these remarks around October of 2001 just after the 911
attacks were fresh on minds. We remarked how Osama 

Bin Laden decreed death in America because America did something
against Arabs, Muslims or Arab and Muslim lands, and then showed Ted
Seeber approved of the extermination of ALL non-Catholics simply for
not being Catholic, making quite a difference indeed.  Yet this is
what people like Jack Chick, a famous publisher who often exposes Rome
and her plans against all free nations, had been saying all 
along.  By being bold and even over-zealous, Ted Seeber, Teresita, AND
OTHERS, confirmed his words.

This is by far not the end of the issue. Ted Seeber and others had
been saying that historical America sinned against God by opposing, of
all people, KING GEORGE.  They made sure that they used the word
REBELLION prominently against the history of this nation. They made
sure the word was prominent and understood as they dialogued.  We even
remembered Ted Seeber posting somewhere how his "fathers" 
once owned this land, referring to the "New World" the United States
now rests on, before they were up-ended by "rebels." 

As we demonstrated the situation, Ted Seeber found himself having to
cease from posting. The very written agenda of Homeland Security
points arrows directly against Ted Seeber for his remarks. Seeber was
also condemning America while defending Rome. The evidence shows he
had been doing this for a very long time on the Catholic and
Catholic-related newsgroups at least! 

Is that where it ends? NO! They also gave unlimited support to
President Bush, even to the point of claiming we should submit all our
personal information to him and do everything he says EVEN OUTSIDE OF
CONSTITUTIONAL BOUNDS. You heard right, and that's what we're going to
prove. You need to hear things about the issues now taking place all
around you so that you can know the truth about what's going on.
Things are not nearly what they are being presented in the news and
everywhere else. We promise you that you'll hear things in this work
you never heard before. 

As serious as this is, Shan and others expectedly entered the
discussion in order to lie their heads off. They were angry in that we
cornered Ted Seeber under very serious implications in attacking the
US Constitution and all liberty on behalf of Rome. They therefore
advanced upon us to do some damage control in deceit. They began
relentless attacks against us. We had to seriously attempt to dialogue
on the Adventist, Catholic and other newsgroups, and often we
discussed reports detailing how Rome hates the US Constitution and has
been attacking it since its inception using INFILTRATORS to infest
every area of society, especially areas of control in legislation,
religion, education and influence.  Our own experiences as Adventists
in our church where even Adventist leaders caused great turmoil
through demanding underhandedly that the church must change into some
unrecognizable shape and become ecumenical, proved to us that
something was wrong. Well before we entered the newsgroups we
understood that the claims of Jack Chick, among others, were more 
than true!  Quickly we met a bunch of people telling us everyone must
enter discussion and be able to disagree, but who then always start a
relentless attack against the founding principles of our church, and
then became concerned and attacked us even mechanically when we began
to show that a global conspiracy is taking place.  We started to beat
their brains out in discussion, so, as a response they constantly
accused us of hating them just because they disagree, and they worded
their accusations always in a way that no one can disagree with them.
In response to our constant questions, they used every other device,
including name-calling, insults, evasions, diversions... and all of
that was constantly led and followed by preaching against
name-calling, insults, evasions and diversions constantly and
mechanically.

Though they claimed even to come from different Protestant
denominations, they told us that we must not say a single thing about
Rome, lest we cast aspersions against many wonderful people. In
between them saying this, they attacked the Adventist Church
constantly with a relentless thud like a machine gun as if they never
told us we must not attack religion lest it casts aspersions. Upon
reading historical documents, we found that they were behaving as the
Jesuits historically did: having no conscience and breaking every
known rule, especially the ones they pushed upon us and insisted we
must keep. They subscribed to the concept of the "End Justifies The
Means."

In defending Ted Seeber therefore, their major argument here was that
Ted Seeber, in his super-terroristic remarks, was insulted, and that
he, contrary to us, was "kind and courteous" before he was unjustly
attacked by Brother Ted McMillan, and lastly, that Ted Seeber's
remarks do not represent Rome. In between all this, every chance then
they got, they accused us of hatred. When that is done constantly,
then other strange people will enter with the most hateful and even
profane posts attacking us.  Shan is just one example. From 
thence, the ones who complained we were hateful and stressed how much
it upset them, will pretend they don't see the worst hate posts, and
will constantly ignore them. They then ignore us as we constantly ask
them why they don't see hateful posts. This has happened over and over
and over again to the point where we don't even listen to them.  Even
the posts above written by Shan received no opposition nor correction
except from us.  Therefore after people like Shan have constantly
accused us of hatred based upon our posts, Shan enters in gladly and
boldly for reasons we already knew and made the statements he made
above. What then would their reaction be when Shan adds the following
messages clear under their noses:] 

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=71bd538c.0404200435.1d1b98e1%40posting.google.com
From: Shan (shankarees@yahoo.com)
Subject: Burn Heretics: SDAs, JWs, Morons & Badtist Cult 
Date: 2004-04-20 05:35:34 PST 

To make it easy for the Last Judgment, every Christian must here and
now plan on grouping all the Seventh-day Arsinests, Jehovah's
Nutnesses, Morons of Latter Day Ain'ts, Badtists and other cults they
know in their neighborhoods and burn them.

They are going to burn anyway, so why don't we speed up the process.

"Have you burned a heretic today?" should be your motto.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=71bd538c.0404200440.5b425279%40posting.google.com


From: Shan (shankarees@yahoo.com)
Subject: Have you burned a heretic today? 
Date: 2004-04-20 05:40:29 PST 

All good Christians are encouraged to burn a heretic per day at the
least.

Burning worst heretics earn you most credit.  The worst are:

Seventh-day Adventists
Jehovah's Witnesses
Pentecostals 
Baptists
Mormons
Other Fund-a-MENTAL-lists


[As you can see here all Protestants are included as "heretics," but
he lists the "worst" above.  Why are they considered the "worst?"  At
present our best guess is that, with the exception of the Pentecostals
and Baptists, all the others claim to be the "True Church."  This is
very significant since we already suffered from a band of strange
people on "Adventist" discussion forums claiming to be former
Adventists who were trained to attack Adventism.  They attacked the
Adventist Church with deep emotion one reason because, said they, she
claimed to be the true church and therefore believes her FELLOW
Christian brothers and sisters are "inferior" of "damned."  They usual
put the word "FELLOW" Christian brothers and sisters in caps as they
are in ultra-deceive mode.  This is a lie, but they constantly
constructed their words this way and would not stop.  We doused their
position by even reminding them of a then recent and public
declaration by the Vatican that she is the true church.  What then can
be their reply to this?  They ignored us completely and pretended we
didn't post the declaration.  They were no longer emotional over what
they claimed were arrogant "holier than thous."  In many other ways as
they were laying charges and fibbing freely in the air, when we
compared their stated grievances with the history of Rome fulfilling
them much more profoundly, they became calm and made us to know that
Rome was the exception!

What then would their reactions be to the posts above?  We didn't have
to think about what their reactions would be. We have had experience
with them for years and compared their abilities with historical
Protestant documents and the claims of Jack Chick. They actually
believe they will receive rewards in heaven for being unscrupulous. We
automatically thought about one in particular named 
"Teresita."  When Shan entered in for the attack, and it was
understood that although Teresita had already joined many others
entering in to our discussions to tell us we are "hatred"-personified
for exposing such people and that our "hatred" really disturbs and
crawls up her soul, she would not even show concern about the worst
posts of Shan.  Below she replies after we asked her why she would not
respond to or condemn the hatred of Shan:] 

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bne2iq01kmn%40drn.newsguy.com

I have not condemned a single specific line for hate of the Black
Numenorean Vengeance Pact either. Both have equal non-existence.

-- Encyclopedia Teresita

=========

["Hatred" crawls up her unscrupulous soul enough to move to action and
attack us.  What happens when worse hatred moves in?  Teresita was no
surprise for this has happened over and over and over again.  This is
my reply to her:]

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=1rh3qvcnbnun5ch5mfd21sa8me5a92p936%404ax.com
More talent from the servant of the Antichrist. She joins a host of
others who tell us hate really crawls to their soul. We are therefore
condemned eternally. Now Shan comes and curses in the worst manner.
Hate now doesn't bother her, but to follow her training and keeping of
the Jesuit Oath, she can divert by telling us she 
didn't condemn soil samples either! 

To Teresita: WHY DID YOU LIE except for the fact that you are a
servant of the Antichrist TERESITA? Why are all Protestant
documentation of you super-criminals true and literature from Rome
about yourselves a lie?

=========

[We have had to ask them why they lied hundreds of times. Each time
they know better than to answer, so they just ignore us and throw more
lies breathlessly like sand over and over and over again. To then more
demonstrate how free they believe themselves to commit any crime, was
there any surprise to me when Teresita joined Shan in profanity and
soon after posted the following:]

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+%22fuck%22+group:alt.religion.christian.adventist+author:Teresita&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bnh9vh02e13%40drn.newsguy.com&rnum=2
The following topics will merit no furthter reply from me:
1. Jesuit Oath
2. Ustasha, Utaschis, 
whatever the fuck.

-- Encyclopedia Teresita

[Shan is not the only one who attacks us viciously because we exposed
Ted Seeber. But now it is time to see Ted Seeber and what he has
posted. 

Here is the crucial dialogue where Ted Seeber made a very supreme
blunder and condemned whole races of people to death.  It is dated
October 5, 2001 JUST AFTER THE 911 TERROR ATTACKS: 
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=Lsqv7.29125%24xi5.1438277%40sjcpnn01.usenetserver.com&rnum=8

This is what Ted Seeber said during a discussion as he was condemning
the American system of liberty with the Constitution and telling us
that persecution is biblical to Brother McMillan with great
satisfaction: 

================ 

Can you really be said to be believing in the Bible if you don't live
it? 
NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible.
They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible.

================ 

BINGO!! Here he was justifying the crusades and Inquisitions of Rome.
We were talking about crusades and massacres Rome created and
supported! 

NOTICE HOW HE IS SPEAKING IN APPROVAL OF WHAT WAS DONE! THIS IS JUST
THE BEGINNING OF THE CRIMES OF THE MAN TED SEEBER! This that he speaks
is the beginning of many things! 

Here is the clincher that forced Ted Seeber to flee from posting on
the newsgroups. Brother McMillan responded by saying: 

Ted McMillan: 
"NO WONDER YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT ME BRINGING BACK YOUR RECORD OF
HORRIBLE ATROCITIES! They were not even living the bible! Why even
worry about them!" 

[Now, you're ready for this?? This is what Brother McMillan then
said]... 

"WERE THE 5 TO 6 THOUSANDS WHO WERE KILLED BY THE TERRORIST ATTACKS
LIVING THE BIBLE?" 

===========================

[Actually there were 3,000 who were killed.
Friends, remember the date of the terrorist attacks: September 11,
2001. Now look at the date of Ted Seeber's remarks!! Prime Minister
Tony Blair had not long prior given a definition of a terrorist, and
Seeber walked right in and fulfilled it worse than Osama Bin Laden!
Osama claims that many must die because America did something against
his race and/or religion. Seeber condemned everyone BECAUSE THEY'RE
NOT CATHOLIC!! That's why we call him a super-terrorist! 

Ted Seeber gave condolences to the victims of 911 while posting also.
Brother Ted asked him if he really meant it since it is assumed that
most of the victims of that fateful day were non-Catholics!] 

As simple and as striking as these words are, allow me to show you
first that even these don't stand alone to prove anything. With this
statement the man has been condemning the American Constitution and
all liberty. He told us that "liberty is useless, and only causes
schism." Ironically, he gave COMPLETE confidence to our current
national leaders, even telling us we should willingly provide them
with absolutely all our private information and obey EVERYTHING
President Bush says whether or not it goes against the Constitution.
He said he had no problem doing that SINCE HE DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO
HIDE. He said the Constitution and the principles of liberty are,
"incredibly stupid and outdated" in concert with the Bush
Administration telling us that the US Counter-terrorism system was
"outdated" before regressing the principles of the Constitution as a
response to 911. That was fundamentally the ONLY thing the Bush
Administration did which sparked other unconstitutional measures! At
the same time, Seeber expressed disdain and hatred for our national
forefathers. He referred to our system of liberty as the �Protestant
rebellion,� showing his mind is exactly the same as the Inquisitors
centuries ago! 

Seeber said boldly that he works within America to destroy the
principles of liberty it now has and says he is within acceptable
confines to attack it from the inside. WE ARE NOT KIDDING as we will
show you! Does this sound familiar from the Jack Chick material?
Seeber claimed it was his purpose to make sure through
reinterpretation, the principles of the Constitution should actually
be enforced OPPOSITE to the way they are interpreted and enforced
today. WE ARE NOT KIDDING!! Where were others who witnessed all of
this? They were right there attacking not Ted Seeber, but Brother
McMillan for defending the Constitution and exposing and reproving the
super-terrorist! We are talking about Baptists, Lutherans, AND EVEN
ADVENTISTS!  The man Seeber has shown complete indifference to
atrocities against bible-believers but went nuts when those atrocities
were exposed or when we exposed who he and his friends were! All of
them, claiming to come from various Christian denominations--and even
one claiming to be a Wiccan or Witch--had this terrible documented
Vatican disease! 

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=5s3n0vg73j3ij1ft2osp6jnmugum9himi7%404ax.com
In this link above Seeber actually tells us that PERSECUTION IS
BIBLICAL! He tells us that the bible sanctions persecuting Christians
for not seeing religious matters as he does! This belief is far more
prevalent and hidden in society than you would ever imagine!  Any
connection to the issues of atrocities taking place in Iraqi prisons?
President Bush was asked in early June after the Iraqi prison scandal
whether or not persecution was immoral. What was his answer?  Remember
that he side-stepped the question? Seeber gave credit to President
George Bush.  We're going to show you that the President gave
something in return actually earlier to people like Ted Seeber! 

Where then are our priorities? Which is worse: to persecute? or to be
exposed for doing that?  Why then was Ted Seeber ignored for years and
when we saw what he was doing and confronted him, we were attacked and
constantly accused of mental illness and hatred?  Remember the Jack
Chick website documents this as a habit of the foot-soldiers of the
Pope?  

The conflicting issues in the discussions that took place on the
internet dealing with love and hate, can mainly be summed up by the
words of another highly unscrupulous person posting by the name of
Will Nordymeyer. He hated Brother McMillan immediately upon noting
what he had done to Ted Seeber, and so he moved in with attacks using
tactics we had often encountered by these strange killers: always on
the basis of love in Christianity. He was speaking to Brother Ted
McMillan when he leveled the typical accusation: 

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=3cd14f0f_5%40news5.uncensored-news.com&rnum=7
Nordmeyer:
> You are once again being hateful and non-Christian. 
[This comment came because Brother McMillan exposed Ted Seeber and all
who aided and abbetted him. Exposing such people is the stated mandate
for Homeland Security.  Brother Ted then wrote from a previous post:] 

Ted McMillan:
> > A Super-terrorist has condemned all non-Catholics. 

Nordmeyer:
> And Ted continues to call people names. 

================

This is the direct response he gave after Brother Ted commented about
Ted Seeber condemning all non-Catholics to persecution and death!
Notice that Will Nordmeyer didn't bother to deny the claim?  He
instead presents what he claims is a greater concern! This is typical
of most all of them, and they always charge those who expose them with
mental problems.  

You think this is an isolated case where professed Christians by their
actions claim that to name-call is worse than to brutally slay many
people and even bible-believers? These same people constantly accuse
us to this date with being "anti-Catholics!" That was indeed even
their final conclusion after Ted Seeber approved of genocide, we
exposed him, and others moved in to defend him: that we were
anti-Catholic for exposing him! 

Well, the story doesn't end there by no means. After Ted Seeber had
done his work and strange unscrupulous posters followed to aid him and
cover up what was done, another person having the same beliefs moved
forward and more boldly confirmed what Ted Seeber had said. Her name
posting is "Teresita." We bring her up since some of you may not be
convinced that Ted Seeber was deliberate in revealing how he thinks
all non-Catholics should at least die. We bring this up also since
others approached to constantly lie telling us Ted Seeber doesn't
represent the teachings or beliefs of the Vatican. 

I made mention of that great Christian work Foxe's Book of Martyrs,
detailing centuries of uncountable murders of bible-believing
Christians performed by Rome after Ted Seeber's eye-opening behavior.
When I did that, Teresita, on 1/14/2003, referred to the work as: 
"Foxe's Book of Hereticks." This is typical old Catholic language. She
therefore approved of their deaths because they viewed religion
differently: 

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=b0165u09im%40drn.newsguy.com
Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have
the liberty to do in this free country. 

Teresita in response to our inquiries, lied to us on 5/29/2003,
telling us that when she called Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of
Heretics," she was only referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant
Reformation who were a minority group of Christians during that time: 

http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01pej%40drn.newsguy.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl3424526807d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3Dbb521t01pej%2540drn.newsguy.com
How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in
that massive work.  Protestants usually have little to say about the
Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY
ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her
next response as she worked to divert from our advancing questions.
She belied her claim that she was only refering to the Albigenses when
she condemned the Christian martyrs as �hereticks� by condemning
Tyndale, who was NOT one of the Albigenses: 

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bcfbru0230p%40drn.newsguy.com

NEXT: When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is
trained to hide on the matter of the value of human life
(non-Catholic), Teresita says the Vatican merely carried out God's
commands when they killed millions of Christians because the
Israelites did the same with their enemies. THE SAME ARGUMENT THAT
EXISTED DURING THE REFORMATION AND INQUISITIONS!  Here she is freely
admitting that what she claimed were the words of all those
�Anti-Catholics� and �Catholic-haters� have been saying all along were
true. Here is that dialogue: 

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl270768597d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb5kmo0vt2%40drn.newsguy.com
From: Teresita (teresita@newsguy.com)
Subject: Re: Teresita responds inappropriatly
Date: 2003-05-29 12:05:31 PST 
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs86mheig36vm8nec6s@4ax.com>, Susan says...
>Like Ted Seeber, you gave approval to their deaths and then come on
the forums telling me 
>I hate people just because they disagree.
>
>We are still under Homeland Security right through to the destruction of this nation. We are 
>asked to report all terrorist activity found in people who have a profound disrespect of human life! 

Teresita replies: 
We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word: 
Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your
towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what
is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his
covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or 
the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have
forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall
inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an
abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth
to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you
shall stone that man or woman to death with stones." 

=================

Look at the words, "inquire diligently." She later supported the
INQUISITIONS. Our comment: 

ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures
mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament
now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE
NEW TESTAMENT?? 

LASTLY AND MOST STRONGLY: 
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl175085396d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bkkqlo0b0g%40drn.newsguy.com
After telling us that just to expose these facts about Rome she is now
boldly confirming is hatred, what would happen if we took a look at
what ANTI-PROTESTANTISM always was throughout the ages? When we
brought this issue about hatred up for her condemning the lives of all
non-Catholics, since she claims reporting about it is hatred, this is
how she declared Rome didn't hate her victims she was killing: 

Susan Williams says...   
>But super-terrorists--I mean SUPER-TERRORISTS, we are waiting for 
>evidence. We were not born to listen to the worst killers on the 
>earth who tell us what we must do, but when we expose how they are 
>they tell the world we hate Catholics. They can kill all 
>non-Catholics they say, BUT THEY DON'T HATE THEM!   

[OPEN YOUR EARS AND LISTEN VERY CLOSELY TO THIS ONE!!!]   

Teresita replies: 

It's nothing personal. It's just business.   

-- Encyclopedia Teresita 

=========== 

YOU HEARD RIGHT!! FOLKS: DO YOU SEE THE TENSE OF SPEECH SHE IS
USING??? It is the PRESENT TENSE! Here is where begins the issue of
what all of this has to do with you. 

From since that time we have been posting these words quite
prolifically--literally hundreds of times and often attached to most
of my posts. Soon people claiming to be Baptists, Lutherans and other
Protestant denominations moved forward to complain telling us we were
not to post that �nonsense� on their newsgroups! To my disgust, but
not my amazement I found another topic that wasn't declared "nonsense"
being discussed. Check this modified posting just issued 3/17/2004
where I comment in complaint: 

=========== 

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=cuai505loirs2lud8irmmstidsl7psmslh%404ax.com
Marcus Wesson murders nine (recent issue in March). Is this posted on
the Lutheran newsgroups deadly infested with Jesuits? YES! 
[They had no problem with discussing Marcus Wesson: the man
(Seventh-day Adventist) accused of murdering some 9 members of his
family.] 

6,000 people died September 11th [actually 3,000]. Is that worthy to
be put on the Lutheran newsgroups? The Jesuits agree... YES! 
Now we find many people who both issued and supported bold death
mandates AGAINST BILLIONS OF PEOPLE just for not being Catholic! What
do the Jesuits tell me? 

They tell me I'm mental and ask me why I'm bringing "that nonsense" on
the newsgroups! 

In His Grace,


Susan


x--   100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
x--   3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other groups
x--   Access to over 1 Terabyte per Day - $8.95/Month
x--   UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD