🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:04:41 -0700, andysch 
<aschlaflyNOasSPAM@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>Contrary to your earlier posting, I don't think that everyone
>who disagrees with me has a financial bias.  But when someone
>posts dozens and dozens of messages that omit any criticism of
>any industry position, as you have done, financial bias becomes
>an obvious question to ask.
>
Lee's messages seem to me to be statements of the law as he sees it,
leaving the condemnation of one side or the other to those who are
interested in doing so.  I would think his posts would be of interest
to someone on either side of the issue,

Aparently in your view people need to choose up sides or be considered
firmly in the camp of the enemy.  I discuss these issues mainly for my
own entertainment and education.

>Do you think it would constitute an unfair assault on the
>character of Coble and his staff to look into potential
>financial bias influencing them?
>
Would the proper way to probe be to insult and wait for a response?
Should we treat usenet posters differently or is that also the
proper way to probe them also?

Isaac