🚀 go-pugleaf

Eric Johnson wrote:

> On 04-10-2003 16:17, in article 8hltnvkg8t2sm5gptt0vb04urff3kpoac2@4ax.com,
> "Lou Scannon" <scannon@lmountain.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>On 3 Oct 2003 15:37:11 -0700, tallgrassprairie@earthlink.net
>>(Tallgrass) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"JMartin" <antares1947@comwares.net> wrote in message
>>>news:<blifni$dgi$0@12.166.20.62>...
>>>
>>>>When I was a meter reader, I had a truck that only got AM radio.  I was
>>>>stuck with either a fuzzy country station or KFI out of LA.  I usually chose
>>>>KFI.
>>>>
>>>>When Rush Limbaugh came on, I either turned it off or made do with the
>>>>country station.
>>>>
>>>>It's a shame that I have to even see his name in misc.rural.
>>>>
>>>>Jena
>>>
>>>Now, at least, we know what has fueled his vitriolic opinions all this
>>>time....he was out of narcotics!!
>>>
>>>Linda H.
>>
>>
>>Think he'll want to live by his own words?
>>
>>Rush Oct. 5, 1995,
>>
>>"if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be
>>accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up."
>>
> 
> 
> No. He or the situation will be different in some concrete way as to let him
> slip out.
> However, if the right loses rush as a force in their favor, things would
> change in favor of democrats.
> 
> He will -never- accept, even if all is true which I sincerely doubt(4000+
> pills in a 10 day period), that he is anything like a common pot smoker.

Of course he won't!  He has a completely distorted view 
of what a pot smoker is.  He still obviously clings to 
the sort of hysterical imagery portrayed in _Reefer 
Madness_.

And "folks", it doesn't make a bit of difference. 
Short of a knife with Nicole Simpson's blood on it 
being found in Limbaugh's closet, the blind-faith, 
true-believing, stoooooopid dildo-heads will never 
desert him.  "Folks":  that kind of blind faith is not 
admirable.