🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4v-dnUGcM7Zqbc_RnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
 mrmcafee <"(mrmcafee)nospam"@cox.net> wrote:

> Billy wrote:
> > In article <bCo4o.640$Sp1.202@newsreading01.news.tds.net>,
> >  Grizzly <NoOne@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > 
> >>>
> >>> Is it? Weakling "A" thinks that the village water supply belongs to 
> >>> everybody in common. Strongman "B" thinks that the well should belong to 
> >>> him, and has the power to deny water to everybody else. There is no 
> >>> government to judge who is right and to force the outcome of their 
> >>> decision. Both are operating under the libertarian concept.
> >>>
> >>> It is rule of the strongest, anarchy.
> >>>
> >> No it is not anarchy in the purist sense of the word.  What you describe 
> >> is totalitarianism. Anarchists contrary to the image put forth by our 
> >> current government tend to be a peaceable group of folks who go by their 
> >> own moral code, and tend to disregard laws as written by group think. If 
> >> it is a just law in their opinion they would follow it whether it were 
> >> written down or not as it jibed with their own sense of what is morally 
> >> right. If it is an unjust law, they will disregard it and take whatever 
> >> consequences for disobeying it come their way pretty much in stride. 
> >> I've known a few quakers who are anarchists in those terms. Strongman B 
> >> getting over on weakling A is nothing more than a petty dictator forcing 
> >> his will upon another. He may find himself up against an angry mob of 
> >> thirsty weaklings eventually, and then his dictatorial status over the 
> >> well will change through sheer force of numbers.
> > 
> > FOr anarchy to work there needs to be a sense of cooperation and and 
> > mutual respect.
> 
> 
> Anarchy like communism is against human nature. They will not work on 
> anything except a small scale.

Communism, with a small "c" works fine and is the basis of the New 
Testemant. Communism with a large "C" never existed. It was always a 
hoax, like democracy in the US.
-- 
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the 
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/7/2/maude
http://english.aljazeera.net/video/middleeast/2010/07/201072816515308172.html