Article View: misc.rural
Article #1647Re: Undemocratic Rural Vote Process (British Columbia)
From: Tom Ruta
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 00:00
24 lines
1374 bytes
1374 bytes
Marcia & Tim <caven@mint.net> wrote: >Tom Ruta wrote: ... >No, it makes sense to me. You could pay taxes until the cows come home, >but never have to live with the results of the vote, but the full time >residents would. Don't forget that other things are voted on all the >time- not just this one issue. > I can accept that full-time residents should have a greater say (at least in principle). But how do you reconcile the fact that BC residents from say, Vancouver, can vote on property issues in another part of the province while Alberta residents can't? >I wish we could disenfranchise the absentee landlords and carpetbaggers >here in Maine. What about "snow birds" (those rich folks who winter in Phoenix although are BC "residents"? Tom
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<34755ae3.1181225292@news.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3471b5c8.942350368@news.supernews.com> <3474CA46.31B3@mint.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,ceafd7c975a5c2a6 X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-Thread: f514b,ceafd7c975a5c2a6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf514b,public From: rutat@cadvision.com (Tom Ruta) Subject: Re: Undemocratic Rural Vote Process (British Columbia) Date: 1997/11/20 Message-ID: <34755ae3.1181225292@news.supernews.com> X-Deja-AN: 291031300 References: <3471b5c8.942350368@news.supernews.com> <3474CA46.31B3@mint.net> Organization: All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com Reply-To: rutat@cadvision.com Newsgroups: misc.rural,bc.general