Article View: misc.rural
Article #1652Re: Undemocratic Rural Vote Process (British Columbia)
From: Mike Fox
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 00:00
52 lines
2871 bytes
2871 bytes
Tom Ruta wrote: > > I thought (esp.) the rural Canucks would appreciate this one > as might any other non-resident rural land owners. > > We live full time in one province but have a rural place in > another province (British Columbia). Last weekend, a public > referendum was held to decide upon a parcel tax to allow > natural gas service. It was voted down by FOUR STINKING > VOTES! Given that natural gas is way cheaper, it surprises > me somewhat, but that is human nature. > > What _DID_ surprise me, though, is that non-residents of the > province, despite paying taxes HIGHER than local full time > residents (they get grants to offset taxes - depends on age, > etc.) simply CANNNOT vote in _any_ BC provincial elections > or referenda of any kind. In other words, I pay full taxes > but cannot vote on _anything_ involving my property. > > Hardly sounds fair - does it? > Sorry, I don't see it. Yes, it sucks to not have a vote in a jurisdiction where you pay taxes, but, at least in North America, the tradition and/or law is that you can only register to vote at your primary residence. You don't get to vote in two places. It's the same way everywhere. Yes, taxation without representation sucks. But people in your situation aren't the only ones living with it. Whenever I travel, I pay taxes in the jurisdiction where I go (usually taxes aimed at tourists), but that doesn't give me the right to vote there (which is why rental car and hotel taxes are so popular with local voters :). It's just a fact that paying taxes doesn't give you the right to vote -- plenty of tax-paying resident aliens here in the USA can attest to that unfortunate fact. Even paying higher taxes doesn't give you the right to vote. Back to the resident aliens example, many of them don't get the same deductions citizens get (e.g., can't deduct dependents that aren't citizens of or living in the USA), but they still can't vote here. My family owns a second house in rural area. True, we can't vote there. And true, our property tax appraisal is inflated and when we tried to appeal it they laughed us out of there. But that's the way it is -- we vote where our primary residence is, only. It's just a cost of having a second home. Mike -- "Why did kamikaze pilots wear helmets?"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<34719843.61E4@ibm.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3471b5c8.942350368@news.supernews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,ceafd7c975a5c2a6 X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-Thread: f514b,ceafd7c975a5c2a6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf514b,public From: Mike Fox <mikefox@ibm.net> Subject: Re: Undemocratic Rural Vote Process (British Columbia) Date: 1997/11/18 Message-ID: <34719843.61E4@ibm.net> X-Deja-AN: 290439559 References: <3471b5c8.942350368@news.supernews.com> Organization: none Reply-To: mikefox@ibm.net Newsgroups: misc.rural,bc.general