Article View: misc.rural
Article #1655Re: Undemocratic Rural Vote Process (British Columbia)
From: Tom Ruta
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 00:00
59 lines
2851 bytes
2851 bytes
"Richard K. Downer" <richard.k.downer@boeing.com> wrote: ... >> What _DID_ surprise me, though, is that non-residents of the >> province, despite paying taxes HIGHER than local full time >> residents (they get grants to offset taxes - depends on age, >> etc.) simply CANNNOT vote in _any_ BC provincial elections >> or referenda of any kind. In other words, I pay full taxes >> but cannot vote on _anything_ involving my property. >> >> Hardly sounds fair - does it? > >I think it's quite fair to only allow people to vote in one location. Why is that fair? I pay taxes (more - up to three times the "locals"). Are you suggesting then that I need only pay taxes in one location? Besides, keep reading - I address your point further on. > If >you wish to vote in BC elections, establish BC citizenship (residency, >whatever) and register to vote there. I intend to - in the future. The problem is that decisions made NOW impact my ability to do so. >If you think this is unfair, sell >your second home; most people (who can't afford two homes) would >consider you a spoiled rich kid and tell you to enjoy your good fortune >and quit complaining. I have absolutely no problem whatsoever not getting a break on taxes on a second home. Nor do I mind paying school taxes - the largest part of the bill BTW - or for services I do not need. I support the fair and equitable payment of real property taxes. What I, and any reasonably rational and fair and democratic individual might also think is that "taxation without representation" is fascist. >Choosing where you will vote is just another >"cost" of your second home; if you can't afford every aspect of owning >it, you should sell it. Huh? Due to hard work (and not handouts) I _can_ afford it. <I only wish I was a "rich kid"...> But do you realize that non-local residents to an area in BC _can_ vote (non-resident elector clause in the current Municipal Act)? WHat that means is that a full time BC resident DOES have the right to vote in two places. So basically the BC government says we'll take your non-resident money but if as you reside SOMEWHERE in the province you can tell your neighbour what to do. Tom
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3471d457.950173357@news.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3471b5c8.942350368@news.supernews.com> <3470C3DC.797B@boeing.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f514b,ceafd7c975a5c2a6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf514b,public X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,ceafd7c975a5c2a6 X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public From: rutat@cadvision.com (Tom Ruta) Subject: Re: Undemocratic Rural Vote Process (British Columbia) Date: 1997/11/17 Message-ID: <3471d457.950173357@news.supernews.com> X-Deja-AN: 290308919 References: <3471b5c8.942350368@news.supernews.com> <3470C3DC.797B@boeing.com> Organization: All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com Reply-To: rutat@cadvision.com Newsgroups: misc.rural,bc.general