Article View: misc.rural
Article #1659Undemocratic Rural Vote Process (British Columbia)
From: Tom Ruta
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 00:00
29 lines
1688 bytes
1688 bytes
I thought (esp.) the rural Canucks would appreciate this one
as might any other non-resident rural land owners.
We live full time in one province but have a rural place in
another province (British Columbia). Last weekend, a public
referendum was held to decide upon a parcel tax to allow
natural gas service. It was voted down by FOUR STINKING
VOTES! Given that natural gas is way cheaper, it surprises
me somewhat, but that is human nature.
What _DID_ surprise me, though, is that non-residents of the
province, despite paying taxes HIGHER than local full time
residents (they get grants to offset taxes - depends on age,
etc.) simply CANNNOT vote in _any_ BC provincial elections
or referenda of any kind. In other words, I pay full taxes
but cannot vote on _anything_ involving my property.
Hardly sounds fair - does it?
Tom
==============================================================
Need info on COTTAGES, CABINS and RECREATIONAL living?
Check out "Cottage Living" On-Line book store!
http://www.cadvision.com/Home_Pages/accounts/rutat/cottage.htm
==============================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3471b5c8.942350368@news.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,ceafd7c975a5c2a6 X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-Thread: f514b,ceafd7c975a5c2a6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf514b,public From: rutat@cadvision.com (Tom Ruta) Subject: Undemocratic Rural Vote Process (British Columbia) Date: 1997/11/17 Message-ID: <3471b5c8.942350368@news.supernews.com> X-Deja-AN: 290282686 Organization: All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com Reply-To: rutat@cadvision.com Newsgroups: misc.rural,bc.general