🚀 go-pugleaf

On Apr 4, 9:36 pm, climber <coledenk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 5:45 pm, Hisler <His...@cocks.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > bipartisan group of U.S. Senators is teaming up with the Obama
> > administration to legalize illegal immigrants and require biometric
> > national ID cards for every American worker, prompting a swift and
> > bipartisan backlash across the nation.
>
> > The proposal would unconstitutionally force nearly all Americans to
> > obtain the new “tamper proof” Social Security cards while
> > purporting to require that all employers purchase new $800 ID
> > scanners. It would also provide a “path to citizenship” for the
> > estimated 12 million to 20 million illegal immigrants currently
> > living in America.
>
> > Led by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and
> > Democratic Senator Charles Schumer of New York, pro-amnesty and
> > national ID legislators have already started the public relations
> > campaign to build support for the “new and improved” version of
> > “comprehensive immigration reform.” In a column published by the
> > Washington Post entitled “The right way to mend immigration,” the
> > two architects provided a superficial glimpse at their agenda. And
> > though the piece is lacking in details, it reveals a dangerous
> > agenda that Americans must oppose in order to maintain freedom.
>
> > “Our plan has four pillars: requiring biometric Social Security
> > cards to ensure that illegal workers cannot get jobs; fulfilling
> > and strengthening our commitments on border security and interior
> > enforcement; creating a process for admitting temporary workers;
> > and implementing a tough but fair path to legalization for those
> > already here,” wrote Graham and Schumer. “We would require all U.S.
> > citizens and legal immigrants who want jobs to obtain a high-tech,
> > fraud-proof Social Security card.”
>
> > The national ID cards would include a "unique biometric
> > identifier," according to Graham and Schumer. Some of the likely
> > candidates include finger prints, retinal scans, or even the layout
> > of a person’s veins in the top of their hand. Employers who refuse
> > to "swipe the card" would face "stiff fines" and "prison
> > sentences," the Senators noted. “Our blueprint also creates a
> > rational system for admitting lower-skilled workers,” they added.
>
> > President Obama promptly signaled his approval and pledged to “act
> > at the earliest possible opportunity.” The White House released a
> > statement noting that the President would do everything in his
> > power to push the issue, and Obama called the Schumer-Graham
> > proposal “a promising, bipartisan framework which can and should be
> > the basis for moving forward."
>
> > After the Democrats recent success in ramming through the wildly
> > unpopular health care “reform,” analysts suggested the “momentum”
> > from that victory could help Obama and the Democrats in their
> > efforts to pass a variety of legislation - including immigration
> > “reform.” And despite broad opposition by a majority of Americans,
> > the agenda marches forward.
>
> > But the proposals are already meeting fierce resistance from
> > legislators, citizens and non-profit groups. “This so-called
> > comprehensive immigration reform really means amnesty for the 10 to
> > 20 million illegal immigrants in America today,” explained
> > Republican Representative Brian Bilbray of California, the chairman
> > of the House Immigration Reform Caucus. “What part of the word
> > 'illegal' doesn't the president understand?”
>
> > Congressman Ron Paul’s Campaign for Liberty sent out an e-mail to
> > supporters vowing to battle the proposal as well, warning that it
> > was a “statist’s dream” and that the immigration issue was being
> > used as “cover” for an even bigger agenda.
>
> > “Instead of controlling the border and enforcing the rule of law,
> > these statists want to control you,” explained the group’s
> > president, John Tate. “Allowing our government to have this much
> > ‘prying power’ in our lives will ultimately result in the TOTAL
> > loss of freedom.”
>
> > Tate noted in the letter that this sort battle often determines
> > whether a country will remain free or descend into tyranny. “You
> > see, once ‘well-meaning’ government bureaucrats know exactly how we
> > live our lives, it won’t be long until they try to run them,” added
> > Tate. “In fact, it will only be a matter of time until they spend
> > their workdays making sure you and I don’t go anywhere we
> > ‘shouldn’t,’ buy anything we ‘shouldn’t,’ read anything we
> > ‘shouldn’t,’ eat anything we ‘shouldn’t’ or smoke anything we
> > ‘shouldn’t.’”
>
> > In the media, commentators have also blasted the proposal.
> > “Graham's [Republican In Name Only] tactics will enable the
> > President to turn illegal aliens into documented Democrats.  And in
> > the process, hand the Federal Government yet another way to monitor
> > and control our lives,” explained Roger Hedgecock in a piece for
> > Human Events. “Opposition to this tyranny will come from all parts
> > of our divided political spectrum,” he predicted.
>
> > And indeed, even the liberal American Civil Liberties Union is
> > gearing up to fight the “bipartisan” effort. “It is fundamentally a
> > massive invasion of people's privacy,” said Chris Calabrese, the
> > ACLU’s legislative counsel. “We're not only talking about
> > fingerprinting every American, treating ordinary Americans like
> > criminals in order to work. We're also talking about a card that
> > would quickly spread from work to voting to travel to pretty much
> > every aspect of American life that requires identification.”
>
> > These amnesty and biometric national ID proposals are dangerous for
> > a lot of reasons. And this battle is a crucial one. The Social
> > Security cards will quickly go from being required to work — which
> > is bad enough itself — to being needed for everything imaginable,
> > from health care to everyday purchases. But the problem is not a
> > lack of biometric ID cards for the serfs; it is the wide open
> > Southern border and the unconstitutional incentives encouraging
> > illegal immigration.
>
> > Legalizing the tens of millions of illegal immigrants will harm
> > America on several fronts. Not only does it send a loud message
> > that the rule of law means nothing (except if it furthers statist
> > aims), it will also fundamentally alter the voting dynamics of
> > America. The true solution to the illegal immigration crisis is to
> > stop providing perks like welfare to law breakers, and to properly
> > police the border and defend the states from invasion.
>
> > Citizens must unite to defeat this effort. If Obama and his allies
> > like Senator Graham manage to force this monstrosity on the
> > American people, the last remaining semblances of freedom will be
> > in critical danger. Americans already said no to amnesty under
> > former President George W. Bush. Why would adding an
> > unconstitutional national ID scheme with biometric data make it any
> > more desirable? This is not the “change” people voted for, and it
> > must be opposed.
>
> FYI
>
> climber- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I suspect they will try to bulldozer this plan through congress as
they did healthcare.
Recall the McCain of Bush plan that was soundly rejected by an outpour
from the public.
This is worse.  I believe Lindsey Gramnesty (as Limbaugh calls him) is
starting to back off.
Prediction: huge public outcry against plan in spite of which which
dems will push through.