🚀 go-pugleaf

Our TERTIARY TWIT, a thief and self-diagnosed
fool and "SAAP" (Scared And Anonymous Poster)
who is also prone to lies and  self-deception, that
boot-licker now posting as the scurrilous
"Sammy (The) Sediment", wrote:

>Why do the 20/20 Dan?

To stand apart from those who lack principles that
would demand that they take a personal interest
and responsibility for the state of humanity as it
continues down the road to total and all-out use
of all nuclear and other weapons of mass murder.

>As researchers have recently shown,

Which researchers? Are you suggesting that our
SECONDARY TWIT, the *Self-Admitted-Liar*
"Fred (The Groveller) Grosby" <fredg@his.com>
is "a researcher"?

Perhaps you are referring to Canada's
PREMIERE TWIT "MrTaxman" the cowardly
and lie-filled "SAAP"  <taxman@chek.com>
who is so insecure and subjected to bouts of
self-deception that he dare not say whether
or not he works for Revenue Canada??

>you suffered a spectacular defeat before the
>Canadian court, which simply dismissed your
>case with little comment.

You're lying to yourself (again). The court,
acting outside of the rules of the court,
Rule 336(1)(b)(i), proceeded to rule while
it was prohibited, by its own rules, from
doing so.

Of course, the court also stood OPENLY
AND FORMALLY ACCUSED of having a
vested interest in the matter. The facts of
its interests and the interests of all courts,
throughout time, having acted on their
paymasters behalf in such matters, and not
in the fulsome and open function of courts
acting as our necessary arbiters of all that
is just and proper, was part and parcel of
my *Statement Of Claim* and challenge to
the courts and the Government Of Canada.

Note that the very act of striking that
*Statement of Claim* was an impossibility
at law, as the court, apprised of the formal
allegations declaring it to be in a serious
and *INCONTROVERTIBLE* conflict of
interest, was denied the "lawful" capacity to
ignore that which it read in the affidavit, the
motion and the Statement Of Claim and to
then continue, despite  Rule 336 (1)(b)(i) of
its own rules, to dismiss my motion for
*Judgment as the Court may think just, not
withstanding that it is accused by the Plaintiff
of being in a visible, cognizable, critical and
crucial conflict of interest in the matter*.

Indeed, the act of striking my Statement Of
Claim, and especially so under those tainted
circumstances, then invoked all of the conditions
applicable to Rule 419(1)(a) wherein the court, at
"any further trial of the matter", must accept
*AS FACT* each and every allegation that I made
as *FACT* in that Statement Of Claim.

ie. My tertiary twit, the court, by its own actions,
prevented Revenue Canada from daring to ever
again meet me in a court of law and to try to
insist that the courts are not in a conflict of
interest and that society can safely rely on such
courts to be the impartial arbiter of such matters.

The only way in which the courts can begin to
address the matter, is to "deal" with the reality
that I have charged the court with *Contempt
Of Court*. Failing to address that charge, the
court is *estopped* (Read the Doctrine Of Estoppel),
from any course of action that would force it, due
to Rule 419(1)(a) of its own rules, (See Justice Addy's
admonition to the court in a similar matter.) to
then address as undeniable *Fact* each and every
allegation of *Fact* in my *Statement Of Claim*.

ie. Our sorry and scurrilous "Sammy (The) Sediment"
is sucked (Once again.), into the slime of his sty; the
stenchful surroundings of his / her sad sort.

ie. My dearest and most profoundly overstressed and
unlearned twit, the whole of the matter leading to
Decision T2020-88 was crafted to *USE* the will of
the courts to act as their paymasters confirmed and
loyal twits and bootlickers. The issuance of the
identity number *T2020-88* to the matter was a
stroke of incredible luck that has lead to the
ongoing development of *A New Vision Of Duty*.

BTW, have you sought a refund of the purchase price
of your "Juris Doc" degree? Did the mail-order firm
return the whole amount, or retain some on the
pretext that you probably used it once or twice to
pretend that you were a capable lawyer or such?

>An equally spectacular defeat is your inability to
>attract ANYONE to your Worldwide Tax Refusal
>in the last two decades, and the Refusal -- such
>as it  is -- presently consists only of two old men
>and a duck.

You err. No matter how you quack, or how you spread
your feathers and invite your paymaster to *DO* you,
my poor L'IL JIMBOOB, your hopes of being recognized
as a *man* with spine sufficient to do what you MUST in
an age wherein the majority have sold out to the madness
of greed; is without hope. You lack the primary requisite:
Self-Respect and the will and desire to think for yourself.
Perhaps, if the mail-order degree folks aren't too angry at
your mis-use of your "new-found knowledge", they might
sell you another degree that will attest to your principles
and respectability as a "Man Among Men"?? Do they have
a pricing schedule that allow you to claim a "higher order"
of  principles in direct relationship to the price you pay
for such "Degrees"???

As for the numbers of Americans who possess
the spine and character that would demand
they participate in the Tax Refusal and thereby
communicate to the American government that
*The Rule Of Law* is not dictated by the *Right
Of Might*; I shall let you speak for your fellow
countrymen. Should any oppose such, please
feel free to suggest who, other than our scared
and scurrilous "Sammy (The) Sediment" should
speak for the "Men Of America".

>You've lost all credibility, not that you had much
>to start out with.

My credibility is not in question. It is *you* who so
lacks a response to the dynamic paradigm that has
been set in action by the Tax Refusal that you dare
not post under your own name and attempt to refute
the premise of the Tax Refusal or the secure and
imbreachable argument that calls upon all to start
thinking as rational human beings.

Indeed, as a person who so lacks credibility, and is so
transparently insecure that you dare not post under
your own name, you shouldn't even "think" of trying
to *prove* that the premise of the Tax Refusal is not
based on the reality of human interchange and that
such as that which I offer as the "Raison D'Etre" of
the Tax Refusal can not be seriously considered as
being of such a nature as to command the respect
and support of people and jurists the world over.

Further, my credibility is such that a number
of well known and highly credible and established
people from around the world (You'll be pleased to
note that some of them seek to have me moderate
my views with regard to *unavoidable duty*.) have
entered into an exchange of views with me in hope
that some common ground can be found with regard
to the right and duty, as articulated by the
Tax Refusal's proclamation;

"All have a lawful right and duty to refuse to support or
assist any society participating in plans and preparations
involving the will and capacity to commit mass murder.",

and that I consider  rewording it to encompass the
reality that individual, national, and multi-national
and intra-national distrust (If you require a description
as to the applicability and the flux of the relationship
of each to all others, contact me by private e-mail.), is
a valid concern as humanity, due to that distrust,
allows its various nations and societies to continue
a course of development that is dependent on our
will and capacity to mass murder each other.

>For  awhile you could preach the "success" of your
>case, but now that your "success" has instead proven
>to be a defeat there is not much anyone can say  about
>you except that you are a complete fraud.

Hmmm. I'll refer to you to the reality that the
Canadian Government seems to have made a
decision to never again confront me in its
courts with regard to the matter.

It has been suggested to me that it is now
working on the wording of a compromise
that will allow me to feel utterly secure in
my stance with a commitment by the fools
who form the government that, do as I will,
I shall never be subjected to the requirements
of the Income Tax Act no matter the degree of
success that my various efforts shall produce.
The quid pro quo is a promise,  that I shall
simply abandon the Tax Refusal and leave it
to others to take up the torch.

Alas, November 11th, "Remembrance Day",
is soon upon us and Mr. McRae's poem
comes to mind:

In Flander's Fields

In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the Dead.  Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved, and now we lie,
In Flanders fields.

Take up our quarrel with the foe:

(BUT!! WHICH FOE?? The soldiers, French,
German, English, Austrians, Americans, Indians,
Italians;  not a one had a quarrel with any other
soldier other than in the heat of battles forced
upon them by the greed of lying bastards! Why
didn't such soldiers turn their back on such
madness and simply kill each and every
cowardly bastard that asked them to kill
others to satisfy the demands of uncaring
greed????!!?  Why do soldiers continue to fail
to do this simple and self-limiting act that
would put an end to war forever??!!?

Major John McCrae's poem continued . .

To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.

And our cowardly fool, that fearful bit of sediment
that dares not use its own name, nor address a
matter of consequence to the whole of humanity,
so DISRESPECTS THE LIVES LOST IN THE PURSUIT
OF MADNESS that it continues its false litany, its
bleat of lies with respect to the Tax Refusal; and the
DUTY of each and every *MAN* who lays claim to
being such, to join me and to force an  end to the
madness that sees life's greediest bastards strive to
use the sons of fools for false and empty purposes!

Indeed, Canada's premiere twit, the fool (and your
fellow "SAAP", "Mr Taxman" <taxman@chek.com>,
who dares not address a suggestion by one of Canada's
foremost tax lawyers David M. Sherman, and state that
s/he is, or is not, a Revenue Canada employee DARES
NOT accept my standing invitation that s/he comes to
one of my book sales in front of a Revenue Canada office
of its choice in the greater Toronto area and that s/he be
present when I pose a question to the Prime Minister of
Canada or the Minister, National Revenue, who shall be
invited to participate in an exchange of opinions with
regard to the reality that my interpretation of Decision
T2020-88 as a *WIN* recognizing my *lawful* right and
duty as stated in the Tax Refusal's proclamation:

"All have a lawful right and duty to refuse to support or
assist any society participating in plans and preparations
involving the will and capacity to commit mass murder."

has never been challenged since 1990 when I informed
Revenue Canada that any further attempt by it to seize
my funds, or to even contact me with regard to the
matter, would result in my charging each and every
person party to that attempt, including the Minister,
National Revenue, with *Criminal Harassment".

I have never again been contacted.

My accounts have ever again been seized.

Note that various reporters have contacted me with
regard to informing them if either the Prime Minister
or the Minister, National Revenue inform me that
they will take part in a public meeting at any such
sale in front of a Revenue Canada office wherein I
shall make my book:

*Mankind - Mancruel  //  A Choice - A Duty*

available to the public for $5.00/ copy and donate
$2.00 of each sale at that public meeting in front
of a Revenue Canada office to the Prime Minister's
favorite charity.

However, back to your fears with regard to your
lack of principles and intellectual honesty with
which to openly attack the Tax Refusal's very
simple argument and proclamation:

"All have a lawful right and duty to refuse to support or
assist any society participating in plans and preparations
involving the will and capacity to commit mass murder."

Truly, you spineless and spavined twit . .

It is apparent that America's IRS is growing
increasingly worried that the majority of "Tax
Protestors" in America will soon abandon
reliance on "Fringed Flags" and whatever other
hocus-pocus that has been promoted to them
as permitting them to stop paying taxes; and
soon realize that the only "lawful" and truly
permissible reason to refuse to support one's
society is when it is acting against *The Rule
Of Law* and it is actively participating in plans
and preparations that are predicated on a will
and capacity to mass murder millions .

With regard to part of the "Raison D'Etre"
of the Tax Refusal and its proclamation, read
what Albert Einstein had to say about our race
to the abyss of total and all-out use of nuclear
weapons:

"there is no secret and there is no defense; there is
no possibility of control except through the aroused
understanding and insistence of the peoples of the
world.   A. Einstein, Jan 22, 1947

Now,  go to:  <http://www.connection.com/~taxfree>

Answer "The Question", then, if you share 
Albert Einstein's concerns, MAIL YOUR NOTICE 
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OR MAIL YOUR DEMAND
that the Tax Refusal be stopped.
--
Do it!! Learn the 20/20!! Then spit on your stamp!
Pop it in the mail box!  Watch "The Taxman" rant!