🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:25:49 -0700, "P. Maffia"
<pmaffia@centurytel.net> wrote:

>What an idiot you are! By admitting that the problem to access the oil we 
>know exits in vast quantities is cost, you admit that "peak oil" is merely a 
>moronic slogan perpetrated by morons like you a Lavigne.
>
>Idiot, cost is always a factor. And as long as society is willing to pay the 
>cost, "peak oil" can be put off indefinitely.
>
>But that requires at least a modicum of intelligence to understand. A 
>quality sorely lacking in your pea brain.

hey, asswipe, get a fucking clue.  The problem is not an immediate end
to oil, it's an immediate end to CHEAP oil.  It's a bell curve moron.
We have passed peak, but there still is about half of total production
left in the world.  The problem is Peckerwood, that as production
drops off price will skyrocket without something else to take it's
place.  Especially with demand being exponential.  So yea, the problem
IS with cost.  Cost is an essential component to the equation.  And if
you weren't an idiot right winger then you might actually understand
the problem.

Hal

 "Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are
conservatives."       John Stuart Mill


>
><hal@nospam.org> wrote in message 
>news:5j4l74ls0hmjit0c33k5014almuaatop1t@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:49:01 -0700, "P. Maffia"
>> <pmaffia@centurytel.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Bob Brock" <bbrock@i-americia.net> wrote in message
>>>news:ijhk74t0sncto85jtd325cp2vntit67ktv@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:37:10 -0700, "P. Maffia"
>>>> <pmaffia@centurytel.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Well Gunner, the problem is that facts have no relevance to true
>>>>>believers.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I'm wearing my hard hat so that I don't get hit by those falling
>>>> prices produced by oversupply.
>>>
>>>Over or under supply and peak oil are different concepts which have no
>>>necessary relationship to each other.
>>>
>>>In Colorado's Oil shale alomne there is saufficientoil to take care of our
>>>needs for over 100 years. That alone makes the peak oil argument 
>>>worthless.
>>
>> the component you are missing is that the cost of extracting that oil
>> is enormous.  Wouldn't expect you rightards to actually be able to
>> grasp reality.  Oh, sure, the stuff is there.  Wouldn't expect you to
>> be able to actually grasp the concept of getting the shit out of the
>> ground.
>>
>> Hal
>>
>> "Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are
>> conservatives."       John Stuart Mill
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>However, the existance of that oil does not affect either supply or price
>>>since 1) Our laws prohibit its exploitation. There is enough oil off our
>>>coasts to also render the peak oil argument the nonsense it is.
>>>
>>>Unfortunately, our laws also prohibit its expoitation so that vast
>>>storehouse of oil isn't affecting our or the world's supply or price
>>>
>>>Of course, our laws are not stopping from Mexico drilling and finding oil 
>>>in
>>>the Gulf, nor China from finding and expoiting oil close enough to Florida
>>>to illustrate the stupidity of our restrictive laws.
>>>
>>>In short "peak oil" is as moronic as the Club of Rome's predicting the 
>>>world
>>>was going to run out of every resource by the 1990's.
>>>
>>