Article View: misc.taxes
Article #3774Re: Decision T2020-88
From: Daniel J. Lavigne
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00
124 lines
5959 bytes
5959 bytes
Hans Raffelt/scnm/Stentor wrote, on Friday, Nov. 29/96:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> How can I get a copy of the transcripts of this case in question? When you
> wrote that it was
> passed in the "Federal Court of Canada", were you referring to the Supreme
> Court or some other?
>
> Looking forward to hearing from you...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hans.
"Daniel J. Lavigne" <taxfree@planeteer.com> replys:
Hello once again Hans,
I did not use the phrase "it was passed in".
The implications of decision T2020-88, recognizing
everyone's unassailable right, and concurrent and
unavoidable duty, to refuse to support any society
participating in plans and preparations involving
the will and the capacity to mass murder fellow
human beings was the result of the court striking
my statement of claim at the government's request.
The request to strike proceeded under rule 419 (1)(a)
of the Federal Court Rules which accepts in so striking
a claim "that each and every matter of fact in the
statement of claim will be accepted as fact at any
further trial of the matter".
My speech to the court, with witnesses present, ensured
that the government and the court could not subsequently
deny knowing the full nature and application of the
rule under which my statement of claim was struck.
They knew that the contents of the claim, if struck,
would allow me to lawfully refuse to file tax returns
or lawfully refuse to pay taxes forever if I so desired;
or by principled choice, until Canada stopped
participating in the arms race.
They did not know or understand that which they believed
they knew and understood full well; my determination to
force an end to humanity's love affair with violence.
They believed that I would simply go away and enjoy,
privately, the "benefits" of the ruling.
In a similar vein, society will probably find itself
at the point of final decision regarding those weapons
and mindsets to which I so strenuously object; with
no idea or understanding of the depravitys of thought
that will have led it to the end of time.
The government's decision to strike and the court's
actions in so striking can not be lawfully reversed.
The contents of that statement of claim are of such a
nature that upon first reading you will understand the
scope of the victory for humanity.
You may obtain a formal copy of the statement by
contacting:
Court Registry
Federal Court Of Canada
350 University Avenue, 7th floor
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 1R8
My speech to court stressing the implications of
striking the claim under rule 419(1)(a), my attack
on the court and all similar courts and the government
and all similar governments within that speech including
accusations of bias and conflict of interest, concerns
regarding the possibility of lethal and murderous actions
by a government determined to quieten the matter and a
loudly stated and terminating charge to the court
that its actions in the matter confirmed for the
plaintiff the court's contempt for the "rule of law"
and its status as a "serf" to its masters.
I am now including copies of the statement of claim
and that speech with each and every copy of my book:
Mankind / Mancruel
A Choice / A Duty
Copyright 1995 / 1996
Sincerely,
Daniel J. Lavigne
Founder, Co-ordinator
International Humanity House
--
To Another Way
In Flanders Fields birds fly by
Ignored by the poppies and those who died.
To the Lark, the flowers had no choice
Similar, the soldiers who raised no voice.
At early dawn, low pitched cries
Wail at the waste caused by lies.
Why were we lined as tins on shelves?
Why were we lined as sheep for the shells?
In those grey fields, the crows are alert
Sqawking at the moans, the calls from the dirt
That curse empty longings, and scream at greed�s hopes,
Of �things� for ourselves and for others a rope.
In those fields, oft forgotten, some stop to pray
Forgetting the insanity, forgetting the ways
Of boys being men and doing as such,
Murdering on "orders"; then dying like mulch.
Copyright. Daniel J. Lavigne, November 28, 1996
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<329F2991.7B2D@planeteer.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<9611291528.AA3982@SMTPGTWY01.Stentor.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: fd1f1,3878814d8d01627d,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfd1f1,public X-Google-Thread: f7208,3878814d8d01627d,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf7208,public X-Google-Thread: fd42c,3878814d8d01627d,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfd42c,public X-Google-Thread: f6973,3878814d8d01627d,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf6973,public X-Google-Thread: 10bbe0,3878814d8d01627d,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10bbe0,public X-Google-Thread: f7ba9,3878814d8d01627d,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf7ba9,public X-Google-Thread: 114f38,3878814d8d01627d,start X-Google-Attributes: gid114f38,public X-Google-Thread: f64a0,3878814d8d01627d,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf64a0,public From: "Daniel J. Lavigne" <taxfree@planeteer.com> Subject: Re: Decision T2020-88 Date: 1996/11/29 Message-ID: <329F2991.7B2D@planeteer.com> X-Deja-AN: 201435565 references: <9611291528.AA3982@SMTPGTWY01.Stentor.ca> cc: Hans Raffelt/scnm/Stentor <Hans_Raffelt@stentor.ca> content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 organization: International Humanity House mail-to-news-contact: admin@nym.alias.net mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: taxfree@planeteer.com newsgroups: misc.taxes,us.taxes,us.legal,alt.society.civil-Liberty,alt.irs.class-Action,can.taxes,alt.neo-Tech,alt.society.conservatism,alt.politics.economics,alt.philosophy.objectivism,alt.politics.misc,talk.environment,alt.fan.noam-Chomsky,alt.cabal,alt.fan.rush-Limbaugh,talk.philosophy.misc,alt.journalism,alt.society.paradigms,alt.politics,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.correct,alt.politics.datahighway,alt.politics.usa.republican,talk.politics,talk.politics.guns,talk.politics.libertarian,talk.politic x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Macintosh; I; PPC)