🚀 go-pugleaf

A cowardly charlatan, meredith.scsn.net (Kevin Meredith?) 
<meredith.scsn.net-2111960034050001@cola74.scsn.net>, 
seriously upset that individuals now have the right 
to stop supporting societal insanity and the greed 
of his kind wrote:

�I don't support killing of anyone in any form except 
strictly-defined self-defense. And I'm not, as you seem 
to be, prepared to kill someone because of their role in 
a manufacturing or national defense operation that might 
produce an end result I don't agree with. Environmental 
laws and diplomacy, respectively, will go a great deal 
further toward preventing unpleasant outcomes than 
your violence or refusal to pay taxes.�

Challenged to offer a �logical justification� of his beliefs 
that plans and preparations including the weapons and the 
mindsets capable of murdering hundreds of millions of fellow 
human beings including defenceless children were acceptable; 
he relied on a fruitless attack of my success at court to 
hide the evil within his lies and empty hopes.

He wrote a larger amount of stench, none of which he 
can remember to-day without reference to his notes. 

He presents no logic and stays mute as to any alternative 
action that might spare humanity from the all-out use of 
weapons that he believes are essential to the safety and 
economic well-being of his country, masters and self.

Seeking a �well done� from his lords, he claims to have 
great concerns for the individual, �I don't support killing 
of anyone in any form except strictly-defined self-defense�; 
yet he strenuously and plaintively objects to the publicizing 
of an individual�s lawful right to refuse to support plans and
preparations that involve the will and the capacity to cause 
the deaths of hundreds of millions of defenceless children 
and their parents. 

Does he truly believe that plans that accept the murder of 
hundreds of millions of defenceless children fall within 
the meaning of �strictly defined self-defence�? 

Is he such a simpleton as to believe that dated laws calling for 
the payment of taxes in support of such insanity must be heeded? 

Is it not plain that fools such as he would then heed �orders� 
to press the buttons launching the collapse of humanity??

No one, other than fools and cowards, can offer a �logical
justification� for their support of societal insanity.

He blathers about diplomacy and environmental laws while 
knowing full well that diplomacy, as previously practiced, 
has brought us to the edge of eternity as a species. 

He would encourage the naive to rely on environmental laws 
and the �good judgment� of his kind. 

All while he knows full well that those laws and placations 
have led us to a point wherein we can now put a time frame 
on the extinction of all whales. 

They will not survive for the period of time required by 
nature to rebuild the upper level ozone layer. A protective 
layer necessary to counter the threat posed by extensive 
exposure to the sun�s rays. 

Whales can�t buy or apply protective lotion. The 
reflective action of water which concentrates the 
sun�s rays spells their early doom. 

Should we say �Thank You� to bastards such as he and 
his kind? 

Or kiss their outheld hands for the manner in which 
they added to lives of some by stealing form starving 
millions worldwide?

Kevin Meredith(?) has reason, in is own mind, for 
concerns that my writing might lead some to act as 
doctors and to excise or otherwise deal with the cancers 
of society without seeking third, fourth or fifth opinions 
whereby weasels such as he might squirm from stern justice.

Identifying himself as one willing to judge the worth and
value of human existence without ever first being able to 
put a value on his own, he is concerned that the now legal 
right to refuse to support societal insanity may lead to 
hard times and concrete realitys for such as he.

His opportunistic lies failing, and angered to the point of 
apoplexy at the very idea of someone successfully challenging 
societal insanity, he ignored all cautions to think before writing.

Informed that his true status, his vapid concern for others 
andhumanity�s safe passage was known, he continued, and will 
probably continue, to rant  that his masters� preparations to 
risk all for nothing are acceptable.

Beyond contempt, his sorry sarcasm paints a grey picture 
of the graceless greed that framed his soul.

Pray that there not be two more such as he.

Daniel J. Lavigne
Founder, Co-ordinator
International Humanity House
-- 
An Ode To Kevin - The Corrupted Twit 
And That Other Dried Plum, A. L. Dewitt!

Will they learn? Does it matter? 
Will their brains make a splatter? 
>From the 15th floor will they chatter?
Before they're gore, then dogmeat batter!

(Copyright. Daniel J. Lavigne  Nov. 24, 1996)