🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

1 total messages Started by Alan Baggett Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:50
Bribe Allegations hit Canada Revenue Agency : CRA SOTW
#1072
Author: Alan Baggett
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:50
112 lines
6551 bytes
Bribe Allegations hit Canada Revenue Agency : CRA SOTW

Tax Dispute Heats Up

Written by Frank Peebles, Citizen Staff
http://www.princegeorgecitizen.com/20091214999920824/local/news/tax-dispute-heats-up.html
Monday, 14 December 2009

Million-dollar tax miscalculations caused Irvin Leroux to lose
everything he owned, but a tax official also offered to end his tax
troubles for a personal fee.

This is the latest accusation by a Prince George man who was, by
Canada Revenue Agency's own admission (proven in court once already),
the victim of an incorrect tax bill.

The events began with an audit of Leroux's books in 1995, but CRA
officials accidentally shredded all his documents, but forged ahead
with claims that Leroux owed the federal government enormous amounts
of money - about $1 million.

He fought back, insisting that he had always fastidiously paid his
taxes.

In 2005 the CRA dropped their claim that Leroux owed them any money at
all. In fact, they discovered in the process he had actually overpaid
$24,000 in taxes and was entitled to a refund. They paid him that
amount (then took it back immediately for an outstanding GST bill).
Yet the CRA refused to compensate him for all his losses as a result
of the years-long fight. Leroux lost his home, his business (an RV
park near Valemount), land with timber, a housing subdivision, his
life savings, and other assets, not to mention his credit rating and
potential earnings. According to a Statement of Claim Leroux filed in
Prince George court in 2006, his losses equaled more than $4 million.

To properly fight for his lost assets, Leroux asked for copies of all
documents the federal government had that pertained to his taxes. He
and his lawyer received a shipment of 2,500 pages of material, most of
it heavily censored.

One part wasn't blacked out though, said Leroux, and it was the most
important part of the whole ordeal. It was a piece of paper that
allegedly points out a corruption incident. It is now a major part of
a vastly new Statement of Claim that was just handed in to Prince
George court last week. The Citizen got the first look at it, outside
of the legal groups on either side of the issue. In it was a damning
allegation that involved a Prince George tax official named Hansen
(now deceased):

“On Dec. 23, 1998 Hansen telephoned the plaintiff (Leroux) and
requested another meeting to discuss the resolution of (Leroux's) tax
problems,” said the revised Statement of Claim. “The plaintiff met
with Hansen at which time Hansen advised the plaintiff he could
resolve the plaintiff's ‘tax problem’ if the plaintiff would pay
$25,000 cash to Hansen personally. The plaintiff refused, whereupon
Hansen stated that he should reconsider, failing which the plaintiff
would encounter significant, costly problems with the (CRA).”

This week in Prince George court the CRA's lawyers attempted to quash
the proceedings, insisting that too many delays were unfair to the tax
agency. They also asked Mr. Justice Eric Chamberlist to officially
declare Leroux as the one who should bear all court costs if he
ultimately loses the case.

Not so fast, Chamberlist said on both accounts.

“I am of the opinion that this plaintiff should have his day in
court,” the judge said.
He allowed both sides to adjourn for several weeks to properly prepare
their cases in light of the new allegations. He also deferred the
issue of court costs until farther into the proceedings.

“I can understand the position of the defendant with regard to now
having to face amended pleadings from those originally filed,” said
Chamberlist. “But by the same token I am concerned that the court not
deal with issues raised by the plaintiff in his claim without a proper
hearing, and all matters being heard.”

A date is now being fixed between the lawyers for some time later this
winter.

Chamberlist gave the CRA lawyers up to 30 days to revise their defense
documents. When those are submitted, Leroux and his lawyer would have
up to 14 days to prepare their counter-position. At the end of this
back-and-forth, they will return to Prince George court and continue
on with the flow of proceedings.

-----------------------------------

If you’re not up to speed on Irvin Leroux’s Tax Tale you can refresh
your memory via the following links:

CRA Bankrupts BC Couple Over Nothing Part 1 of 2 :CRA SOTW
http://groups.google.com/group/can.taxes/browse_thread/thread/559cea95d252dc/a402a74aaa4f432f?q=

CRA Bankrupts BC Couple Over Nothing Part 2 of 2 :CRA SOTW
http://groups.google.com/group/can.taxes/browse_thread/thread/bdde6e32ab007b87#

Irvin Leroux’s Sane Response to CRA’s Insane $5 Million Dollar
Mistake :CRA SOTW
http://groups.google.com/group/ns.general/browse_thread/thread/7f4ca87772996bfb/edecb774f6fc8bb9?q=


-----------------------------------------------------------
Miss a Tax Tale Miss a lot!
Visit the CRA SOTW Library at http://canada.revenue.agency.angelfire.com
------------------------------------------------------------
Alan Baggett – Tax Collector’s Bible
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads