๐Ÿš€ go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by Alan Baggett Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:35
Keep Good Records! : CRA SOTW
#1786
Author: Alan Baggett
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:35
104 lines
6187 bytes
Keep Good Records! : CRA SOTW

Keep good records in case of net-worth assessment by CRA.

By Arthur Drache
Published: Tuesday, August 28, 2007

One of the main tools the taxman employs in chasing alleged tax
evaders is a process called a "net-worth assessment." It is used when
the Canada Revenue Agency becomes suspicious that somebody is living
beyond his or her means, as indicated by prior years' tax returns.

A person who drives a paid-for Mercedes and lives in an $800,000 home
who has regularly shown $25,000 a year in income on tax returns would
be a prime candidate.

In a nutshell, the CRA auditors do an assessment of how much the
individual is worth, less debts. They then look at declared income for
the period in question, take into account living and other expenses
and any other relevant factors. If there is a "gap", the CRA will
assume it represents undeclared income and will come after the
individual for the tax, interest and penalties.

Of course, there may be a host of valid explanations. Maybe the
individual won the lottery. Maybe he or she inherited money or had it
given to them. Maybe the money isn't theirs, but belongs to somebody
else.

All these factors may go to rebut the presumption that there has been
substantial amounts of unpaid tax ? but it takes a fair degree of hard
proof by the individual to persuade Revenue or, in some cases, the
court.

Some aspects of our tax system have made net-worth assessments more
important to the taxman than in years gone by. Thirty years ago, when
Canada had both estate taxes and succession duties, a lot of
undeclared income showed up in cash at death.

Almost every lawyer from that era recalls the formal opening of safe
deposit boxes (in the presence of tax officials) to find bundles of
cash, usually money skimmed from a legitimate business.

And most had stories about clients who had been robbed and could not
report the scope of their losses because they were keeping the money
in cash, at home. With the elimination of death taxes of these types
(not to mention gift taxes) the ability of the government to trace
hoards of money was diminished.

It is not surprising that many of the net worth assessment cases
involve immigrants. Many come from countries where there is little
trust in the banking system and they bring cash and other valuable but
portable types of wealth with them.

Because they do not have to declare what they bring to Canada, their
starting capital never is identified properly, especially if they do
not immediately buy a home, business or put the assets in a bank or
with a broker.

Years pass and a net-worth assessment identifies a gap between
declared income and net wealth, raising the question. The individual
then claims that he or she brought the money with them but without
firm evidence, they may be unsuccessful in court, where the onus is on
them to prove their case, not on the taxman.

Sometimes they claim the money does not belong to them but to
relatives who may still be abroad. Almost 30 years ago, we had a
client from an African country whose family had a luxury car
dealership. It was forbidden to export funds from that country and the
family, being of a minority group, always felt under threat.

They arranged for foreign car manufacturers in Germany to "kick back"
part of the purchase price and to send it to our client, a cousin in
Canada. When he came to ask about the tax implications, we arranged a
meeting with Revenue Canada, which understood the situation.

Revenue decided that he held the money in trust for a nonresident. All
the taxman wanted was the appropriate non-resident withholding tax on
the interest. The department also agreed that nowhere in their
official records would it "name names" of the true owners of the
money.

Several years later, in the wake of an uprising, the family escaped
from home and came to Canada to receive a nest egg, which was the
genesis of a business that thrives today.

The key to beating a net-worth assessment (assuming you haven't been
cheating on your taxes) is to document the receipt of any significant
funds you receive particularly when the funds come from outside
Canada. Good paper almost always will prevail, but in a contest of
your unsupported word against Revenue, you'll almost always lose.


Arthur Drache, CM, QC. is an Ottawa lawyer with Drache LLP. He is also
counsel to Miller Thomson LLP, a national law firm. His e-mail address
is adrache@drache.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miss a Tax Tale Miss a lot!
Pop the link below into your browser to view the entire CRA SOTW
Library!
http://canada.revenue.agency.angelfire.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alan Baggett โ€“ Tax Collectorโ€™s Bible
Re: Keep Good Records! : CRA SOTW
#1784
Author: Old and Grunpy
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:03
109 lines
6353 bytes
"Alan Baggett" <canada.revenue.agency@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:ac94e571-3f83-4447-96b4-3f9e6850ae54@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
Keep Good Records! : CRA SOTW

Keep good records in case of net-worth assessment by CRA.

By Arthur Drache
Published: Tuesday, August 28, 2007

One of the main tools the taxman employs in chasing alleged tax
evaders is a process called a "net-worth assessment." It is used when
the Canada Revenue Agency becomes suspicious that somebody is living
beyond his or her means, as indicated by prior years' tax returns.

A person who drives a paid-for Mercedes and lives in an $800,000 home
who has regularly shown $25,000 a year in income on tax returns would
be a prime candidate.

I don't know why they don't do that in USA
in my town specially they live in million dollar home and driving Mercedes'
with minimum wage income, something wrong some place

In a nutshell, the CRA auditors do an assessment of how much the
individual is worth, less debts. They then look at declared income for
the period in question, take into account living and other expenses
and any other relevant factors. If there is a "gap", the CRA will
assume it represents undeclared income and will come after the
individual for the tax, interest and penalties.

Of course, there may be a host of valid explanations. Maybe the
individual won the lottery. Maybe he or she inherited money or had it
given to them. Maybe the money isn't theirs, but belongs to somebody
else.

All these factors may go to rebut the presumption that there has been
substantial amounts of unpaid tax ? but it takes a fair degree of hard
proof by the individual to persuade Revenue or, in some cases, the
court.

Some aspects of our tax system have made net-worth assessments more
important to the taxman than in years gone by. Thirty years ago, when
Canada had both estate taxes and succession duties, a lot of
undeclared income showed up in cash at death.

Almost every lawyer from that era recalls the formal opening of safe
deposit boxes (in the presence of tax officials) to find bundles of
cash, usually money skimmed from a legitimate business.

And most had stories about clients who had been robbed and could not
report the scope of their losses because they were keeping the money
in cash, at home. With the elimination of death taxes of these types
(not to mention gift taxes) the ability of the government to trace
hoards of money was diminished.

It is not surprising that many of the net worth assessment cases
involve immigrants. Many come from countries where there is little
trust in the banking system and they bring cash and other valuable but
portable types of wealth with them.

Because they do not have to declare what they bring to Canada, their
starting capital never is identified properly, especially if they do
not immediately buy a home, business or put the assets in a bank or
with a broker.

Years pass and a net-worth assessment identifies a gap between
declared income and net wealth, raising the question. The individual
then claims that he or she brought the money with them but without
firm evidence, they may be unsuccessful in court, where the onus is on
them to prove their case, not on the taxman.

Sometimes they claim the money does not belong to them but to
relatives who may still be abroad. Almost 30 years ago, we had a
client from an African country whose family had a luxury car
dealership. It was forbidden to export funds from that country and the
family, being of a minority group, always felt under threat.

They arranged for foreign car manufacturers in Germany to "kick back"
part of the purchase price and to send it to our client, a cousin in
Canada. When he came to ask about the tax implications, we arranged a
meeting with Revenue Canada, which understood the situation.

Revenue decided that he held the money in trust for a nonresident. All
the taxman wanted was the appropriate non-resident withholding tax on
the interest. The department also agreed that nowhere in their
official records would it "name names" of the true owners of the
money.

Several years later, in the wake of an uprising, the family escaped
from home and came to Canada to receive a nest egg, which was the
genesis of a business that thrives today.

The key to beating a net-worth assessment (assuming you haven't been
cheating on your taxes) is to document the receipt of any significant
funds you receive particularly when the funds come from outside
Canada. Good paper almost always will prevail, but in a contest of
your unsupported word against Revenue, you'll almost always lose.


Arthur Drache, CM, QC. is an Ottawa lawyer with Drache LLP. He is also
counsel to Miller Thomson LLP, a national law firm. His e-mail address
is adrache@drache.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miss a Tax Tale Miss a lot!
Pop the link below into your browser to view the entire CRA SOTW
Library!
http://canada.revenue.agency.angelfire.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alan Baggett - Tax Collector's Bible 
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads