🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Oct30.035458.23144@ncsu.edu>, dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
> In article <-ha1ajd@rpi.edu> 
> keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
> 
> > with overpeck seemingly out of the picture, who
> > will rise to the top in posting credible, anti-choice
> > articles (if there is truly such a thing)?
> 
> Why should you care, you never respond to articles
> in any substantial way.

The next time Reverend Doug starts yammering about how those
wicked evil bad pro-choicers just bash and bash and so on
and tries to cloak himself in his righteous purity because
he thinks all he posts are sweetness and light articles seeking
Truth, remember this uncalled for snottiness when Keegan
asked what is not an unreasonable question.  (And if it
is Keegan's opinion that Bill Overpeck is one of the very
few who posts credible, anti-choice articles, it is not
so terrible a thing that it requires a bash from the Reverend,
if he in fact were such a sweet guy as he likes to paint himself
whenever he's telling the world how wicked, for example, Susan
Garvin and I are.)

Dean Kaflowitz, wicked bad evil cause of all that is wrong with
the world mean nasty Dean Kaflowitz