Re: "Lost In Space" was better

Article View: misc.test

Article #2379

#2379

From: Remek Lipinski
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 01:29

10 lines
1059 bytes

In article <1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu> thf2@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>I don't see what's so special about Star Trek.  "Lost in Space" was
>clearly superior, but you don't see five newsgroups devoted to Tobor.

Thats because the got lost in the net :)

===============================================================================
** Remek Lipinski   :  remek@mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU                              **
**                                              "I'll be back!"  - T800      **
===============================================================================

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9227211.4631@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!cs.mu.OZ.AU!mamura!remek

References: <1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: misc.test,talk.bizarre,rec.arts.startrek.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!cs.mu.OZ.AU!mamura!remek
From: remek@mamura.ee.mu.oz.au (Remek Lipinski)
Subject: Re: "Lost In Space" was better
Message-ID: <9227211.4631@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Sender: news@cs.mu.OZ.AU
Organization: Electrical and Electronic - University of Melbourne 
References: <1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 01:29:13 GMT
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message