Re: "Lost In Space" was better

Article View: misc.test

Article #2409

#2409

From: Joseph H Julicher
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 17:55

11 lines
1054 bytes

In article <1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu> thf2@quads.uchicago.edu  
(Citecheck Hell) writes:
> I don't see what's so special about Star Trek.  "Lost in Space" was
> clearly superior, but you don't see five newsgroups devoted to Tobor.
> -
There were no movies made for LIS and no new generation of movies.  So which  
one is lasting longer. or which one made more money?

Joe Julicher
Always going forward 'cause I can't find reverse

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep28.175535.7570@cs.rose-hulman.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!newshost.cs.rose-hulman.edu!news

References: <1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: misc.test,talk.bizarre,rec.arts.startrek.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!newshost.cs.rose-hulman.edu!news
From: julichjh@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Joseph H Julicher)
Subject: Re: "Lost In Space" was better
Message-ID: <1992Sep28.175535.7570@cs.rose-hulman.edu>
Sender: news@cs.rose-hulman.edu (The News Administrator)
Nntp-Posting-Host: o233-07.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
References: <1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 17:55:35 GMT
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message