Article View: misc.test
Article #2422Re: "Lost In Space" was better
From: 00nderwin
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 21:34
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 21:34
14 lines
1125 bytes
1125 bytes
In article <1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu>, thf2@quads.uchicago.edu (Citecheck Hell) writes: > I don't see what's so special about Star Trek. "Lost in Space" was > clearly superior, but you don't see five newsgroups devoted to Tobor. > Them's fightin' words. Besides the fact that the special effects were tremendously better, Star Trek had real plots and story lines, and the fact that Star Trek has endured should tell you something. I suggest you go back to watching your B movies and second rate late night T.V. on USA Network, and leave us normal people alone. An angry Trek Fan Fleet Admiral Erwin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep28.163455.9945@bsu-ucs.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!bsu-cs!bsu-ucs.uucp!00nderwinReferences:
<1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!bsu-cs!bsu-ucs.uucp!00nderwin From: 00nderwin@bsu-ucs.uucp Newsgroups: misc.test,talk.bizarre,rec.arts.startrek.misc Subject: Re: "Lost In Space" was better Message-ID: <1992Sep28.163455.9945@bsu-ucs.uucp> Date: 28 Sep 92 21:34:55 GMT Article-I.D.: bsu-ucs.1992Sep28.163455.9945 References: <1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu> Followup-To: misc.test,talk.bizarre,rec.arts.startrek.misc Lines: 14