Article View: misc.test
Article #2429Re: "Lost In Space" was better
From: bd Brice Dowaliby
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 11:33
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 11:33
11 lines
1157 bytes
1157 bytes
thf2@quads.uchicago.edu (Citecheck Hell) writes:
>I don't see what's so special about Star Trek. "Lost in Space" was
>clearly superior, but you don't see five newsgroups devoted to Tobor.
Pretty lame attempt, Ted. Do you really think many people will bite?
--
Brice Dowaliby, Fluent Inc., 10 Cavendish Court, Lebanon, NH 03766
bd%fluent@dartmouth.edu
I don't speak for them, they don't speak for me
DoD # 0698
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BD.92Sep29073315@fluent.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!bu.edu!dartvax!fluent!fluent!bdReferences:
<1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!bu.edu!dartvax!fluent!fluent!bd From: bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby) Newsgroups: misc.test,talk.bizarre,rec.arts.startrek.misc Subject: Re: "Lost In Space" was better Message-ID: <BD.92Sep29073315@fluent.UUCP> Date: 29 Sep 92 11:33:15 GMT References: <1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu> Sender: bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby) Reply-To: bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU Followup-To: misc.test,talk.bizarre,rec.arts.startrek.misc Distribution: na Organization: Fluent Inc., Lebanon NH Lines: 11 In-Reply-To: thf2@quads.uchicago.edu's message of 26 Sep 92 23:22:25 GMT