Article View: misc.test
Article #2487Re: "Lost In Space" was better
From: gary l. schroeder
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 13:08
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 13:08
18 lines
1301 bytes
1301 bytes
In article <1992Sep29.171121.9971@bsu-ucs.uucp> 00sdriddle@bsu-ucs.uucp writes: >In article <1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu>, thf2@quads.uchicago.edu (Citecheck Hell) writes: >> I don't see what's so special about Star Trek. "Lost in Space" was >> clearly superior, but you don't see five newsgroups devoted to Tobor. > Lost in Space better than Star Trek? Everyone knows >Space: 1999 is better than both put together! But, if I had to choose between Trek and Lost in Space, I'd still probably go with Jason of Star Command. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gary L. Schroeder | schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov | Boo. Brookhaven National Laboratory |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep30.130819.1565@bnlux1.bnl.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!chx400!zeus.ieee.org!rutgers!gatech!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!psinntp!bnlux1.bnl.gov!schroedeReferences:
<1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Sep29.171121.9971@bsu-ucs.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!chx400!zeus.ieee.org!rutgers!gatech!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!psinntp!bnlux1.bnl.gov!schroede From: schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder) Newsgroups: misc.test,talk.bizarre,rec.arts.startrek.misc Subject: Re: "Lost In Space" was better Message-ID: <1992Sep30.130819.1565@bnlux1.bnl.gov> Date: 30 Sep 92 13:08:19 GMT References: <1992Sep26.232225.10792@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Sep29.171121.9971@bsu-ucs.uucp> Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973 Lines: 18