Article View: misc.test
Article #250Re: DOS not operating system, film at 11. :-)
From: Thomas (Ted) Lilley
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 09:08
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 09:08
12 lines
1141 bytes
1141 bytes
In article <1992Nov3.052326.10499@netcom.com> xtifr@netcom.com (Chris Waters) writes: > >And finally, one more time, for those who simply cannot comprehend such >a simple concept: THE QUESTION OF WHETHER DOS, WINDOZE, OR EVEN CP/M IS >AN OPERATING SYSTEM HAS *NOTHING* TO DO WITH OS/2!!! > >Do NOT post a followup to this article!! You have been warned! :-) Instead of repeating this (again) and responding to replies, why don't you start an on-topic thread? Right now there don't seem to be any. Ted
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov3.090848.23761@muddcs.claremont.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!emory!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!jarthur.claremont.edu!tlilleyReferences:
<1992Nov2.090335.21329@netcom.com> <1992Nov02.215818.22347@microsoft.com> <1992Nov3.052326.10499@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!emory!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!jarthur.claremont.edu!tlilley From: tlilley@jarthur.claremont.edu (Thomas (Ted) Lilley) Newsgroups: misc.test Subject: Re: DOS not operating system, film at 11. :-) Message-ID: <1992Nov3.090848.23761@muddcs.claremont.edu> Date: 3 Nov 92 09:08:48 GMT Article-I.D.: muddcs.1992Nov3.090848.23761 References: <1992Nov2.090335.21329@netcom.com> <1992Nov02.215818.22347@microsoft.com> <1992Nov3.052326.10499@netcom.com> Sender: news@muddcs.claremont.edu (The News System) Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711 Lines: 12