🚀 go-pugleaf

gl8f@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl) writes:
>tyger@netcom.com (Kitty in the Middle) writes:
>
>>Suffice it to say, Gregory, that I still don't agree that this is a totally
>>inappropriate place for chatty posts. As I said earlier, there is 
>>alt.romance.chat, but on further reflection I recalled that there are many 
>>sites that don't get it. Alt.personals may be the least inappropriate group
>>for some of these people. 
>
>How many sites don't get soc.singles? Why don't you give it a try,
>instead of wasting your time flaming me? After all, you pretend like
>you have better things to do than flame me...

Oh, but Gregory, I *do* read soc.singles! Terribly exciting place...do you 
read it? I ask only because if you did, surely you would have seen my posts?
Chat is frowned on in soc.singles, although banter is often encouraged. From
what I have seen, I'm still trying to work out the difference twixt the two.

Flaming is such a nasty phrase, Mr. Lindahl, I prefer "setting the record 
straight", especially seeing as you seem to have gotten it quite bent. I 
rather enjoy setting the record straight...:)

Tyger
-- 
      Kristen Kohlbecker    And I would choose to be with you
      tyger@netcom.com      That's if the choice were mine to make   
                            But you can make decisions too
      A Tyger and a Lady    And you can have this heart to break